• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

The "Smash-and-Grab" Doper Thread

From Indurain to Armstrong to Team Sky to current day, cycling seems to always have a Top Dog of Doping sitting comfortably on the throne, levels above everyone else, preaching the "cleanest team", "most tested rider" or "never tested positive" mantra while crushing every other rider with impunity. Maybe we should feel blessed that we at least have two teams in that category recently instead of one all-conquering force, but I think after 35 years of doping fatigue it's time to take a break and remember the best category of doper there is - the Smash-and-Grab Doper.

A Smash-and-Grab Doper is not Armstrong or Froome. He does not reign at the top for the better part of a decade, insulting spectators the whole way with mutant transformations combined with being given seemingly bulletproof immunity from the cycling big-wigs. Nor is he Sayar, Ricco or Kohl, a rider stupid enough to fail the IQ test after dominating a race out of nowhere and immediately testing positive with a radioactive in-competition sample, or someone like Pliuschin or Sinkewitz, riders of such profound irrelevance and lack of noteworthiness that they don't even have the decency to use their enhanced performance to make their mark on races, the overwhelming consensus upon hearing about their failed tests being a simple "...who?"

The Smash-and-Grab Doper languishes in back-of-the-peloton mediocrity for his entire career until he viciously and suddenly strikes with outrageous audacity, taking home a couple of shock victories out of nowhere before retreating back into the obscurity from whence he came, skillfully avoiding the limp arm of the law every step of the way.

I'll start us out with two obvious examples:

Alexander Foliforov - Stage 15 of the 2016 Giro d'Italia
Foliforov avoided attention leading up to stage 15's individual time trial up Alpe di Siusi by only finishing in the top 50 on a single stage in the race - a 12th place on stage 13. With only a minute and a half separating the top three riders in the GC - Kruiswijk, Nibali and Chaves - it was set to be a ferocious battle for the Maglia Rosa, but Foliforov came out of nowhere to snatch the stage win, with his GazProm team mate Firsanov also claiming 4th place. It was to be Foliforov's only victory in the top three divisions of UCI racing in his entire career.

Mark Padun - 2021 Criterium du Dauphiné
I love Mark Padun. He is truly legendary. The first six stages of this edition of the Dauphiné went by without Mark Padun even giving us a whiff of what was to come. His best results before this were a couple of stage wins in smaller stage races and some mediocre junior results. Going into the 7th stage of the Dauphiné he was 95th overall, 32 minutes down on the overall leader and hadn't claimed a single sprint or KOM point. Then the bomb went off. On the finish up to La Plagne he rode away from everyone, finishing over half a minute up on eventual winner Richie Porte. The next day, on a stage with six categorised climbs, including the HC Joux-Plane, he immediately got into a 17 man breakaway that also featured Jonas Vingegaard. From there he claimed every KOM sprint along the way to secure the KOM jersey while also riding the entire breakaway off his wheel one by one, winning the stage a minute and a half ahead of Vingegaard and two minutes ahead of the GC contenders. Mark was famously and inexplicably dropped immediately from Bahrain's 2021 Tour team despite this stellar showing just a month before the race, and apart from a time trial stage in the very-much-not prestigious Gran Camiño the year after, he has not won a race since. In fact, in the last couple of years just being able to finish the race within the time limit is well above expectations for Padun.

Post your favourite audacious out-of-literally-nowhere performances below, either from the past or as they happen in the future. I think we can all agree that this is the peak of cycling pantomime?
 
At first I was outraged you didn't mention the legendary Ivailo Gabrovski, but after reading some more, he can be put firmly in the Sayar/Ricco/Kohl category and thus excluded.

Let me instead suggest Murilo Fischer's autumn of 2005, Isidro Nozal's 2003 Vuelta (didn't actually win, but it was a damn good attempt), Búfalo's 2006 Giro (similar to Nozal, although Gutierrez was never close to winning it).

Also, I know he's been top 10 in the Tour together with some other strong results, and he tested positive later in his career like Nozal, but Brajkovic winning the 2010 Dauphiné could belong in this thread too, I feel.
 
Last edited:
Yes the smash and grab is the only morally justifiable kind of doping. Realise you've spent your life on something only to be beaten by a gang of bandits, charge up to win a race or two, get a decent contract to feed your family and then *** off. The extraordinary ease that Oliver Zaugg jumped from a group containing Purito, Basso, Martin, Gilbert on Vila Vergano stood out to me back in the day. It was no fluke like people sometimes suggest. He was a decent enough climber and had a couple of reasonable finishes, but his 1 career victory being a monument and once being a part of the Gerolsteiner and Saunier-Duval sets the alarm bells ringing for me.

I was going to nominate Geschke's 2021 Tour de Romandie demonstration but he'd already won a Tour stage in 2015. If anyone is interested in the sub-category of 'relapsed smash and grab doper', check out the season 36 year old Riccardo Zoidl is having.
 
Yes the smash and grab is the only morally justifiable kind of doping. Realise you've spent your life on something only to be beaten by a gang of bandits, charge up to win a race or two, get a decent contract to feed your family and then *** off. The extraordinary ease that Oliver Zaugg jumped from a group containing Purito, Basso, Martin, Gilbert on Vila Vergano stood out to me back in the day. It was no fluke like people sometimes suggest. He was a decent enough climber and had a couple of reasonable finishes, but his 1 career victory being a monument and once being a part of the Gerolsteiner and Saunier-Duval sets the alarm bells ringing for me.

I was going to nominate Geschke's 2021 Tour de Romandie demonstration but he'd already won a Tour stage in 2015. If anyone is interested in the sub-category of 'relapsed smash and grab doper', check out the season 36 year old Riccardo Zoidl is having.
Zoidl is one of those guys who always had way more watts when he did't have to deal with the bio-passport. He had like one good season at WT (2014) and even that one was less impressive than his previous CT-level season. Once again really strong at CT level in 2018, a lot less impressive when he joins CCC.

In that sense he's the Austrian Dani Diaz, he knows how to prepare without the bio-passport and manages to pull it off without getting caught.
 
At first I was outraged you didn't mention the legendary Ivailo Gabrovski, but after reading some more, he can be put firmly in the Sayar/Ricco/Kohl category and thus excluded.

Let me instead suggest Murilo Fischer's autumn of 2005, Isidro Nozal's 2003 Vuelta (didn't actually win, but it was a damn good attempt), El Bisonte's 2006 Giro (similar to Nozal, although Gutierrez was never close to winning it).

Also, I know he's been top 10 in the Tour together with some other strong results, and he tested positive later in his career like Nozal, but Brajkovic winning the 2010 Dauphiné could belong in this thread too, I feel.
You mean Búfalo I think? Bisonte is Cobo, although his 2011 Vuelta would have counted for this for several years at least.

Tbh Bradley Wiggins' 2012 season probably ought to count as well as Damiano Cunego's 2004.

Team Europcar and Jelle Vanendert in the 2011 Tour would definitely be a candidate too. Ryder Hesjedal in the 2012 Giro as well bears many of the hallmarks, as does the overperforming domestique work of Peter Stetina in the same race.

And Olga Zabelinskaya and Kristin Armstrong.
 
Froome is the definition by a smash-and-grab doper. He was just good 8 years instead of a stage race or even just a stage. Before and after, total obscurity, and Im still really impressed that he hasn't been banned yet.
I think Froome is a difficult rider to put into a box because he clearly arrived into peloton racing with almost zero race craft, zero bike handling skills or racing experience, just had a big unusable engine. Riders who crossed paths with him in the earlier years all generally confirm the same story and are pretty consistent. Dowsett being the latest a couple of weeks ago sums up Froome similarly too. Basically numbers nobody in the peloton had but he couldn't use them because he couldn't race a bike. Once he had 8 chaperones getting him to the front of the race for the final climb, Froome just needed to launch. Dowsett said when they first got a PM, the coach asked to do a 20min FTP. Froome did it and recorded 450 watts. Coach says that's very good, Froome apparently did another 20 minute test straight after and did 450W again as he didn't know if it was good or not - at 68kg and that's the moment Sky put 8 riders around him once the coach realised he could do 450W @ 68kg for 40mins.(6.62W/kg)

View: https://youtu.be/DnGKpEPEdUM?si=77rq6yfmqQcuEsaX&t=2210
 
Last edited:
Froome is the definition by a smash-and-grab doper. He was just good 8 years instead of a stage race or even just a stage. Before and after, total obscurity, and Im still really impressed that he hasn't been banned yet.
I think it's kinda rude to ignore and attempt to redefine the whole premise of the thread as laid out by OP in quite explicit terms. Froome doesn't remotely qualify
 
I think Froome is a difficult rider to put into a box because he clearly arrived into peloton racing with almost zero race craft, zero bike handling skills or racing experience, just had a big unusable engine. Riders who crossed paths with him in the earlier years all generally confirm the same story and are pretty consistent. Dowsett being the latest a couple of weeks ago sums up Froome similarly too.
View: https://youtu.be/DnGKpEPEdUM?si=77rq6yfmqQcuEsaX&t=2210
Yeah the usual reliable narrators not explaining the Sky graph where Froome was literally their lowest rated rider.
 
Padun is a f**king legend but what makes it even more incredible is that the team didn't take him to the Tour after his lifetime performances! The radioactivity level must have been too high even by Bahrain standards :tearsofjoy:

But you know what? Froome is an excellent example of a prolonged smash-and-grab. Suddenly from nobody to a champion and in the later part of his career equally shocking change in the opposite direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cookster15
Glad Mark Padun is mentioned but also Chris Horner. With Horner what really irked me was his transformation when he changed teams from Lotto to Astana at the end of the 2007 when he was already 37. I think one reason he got away with it was he was considered a nice guy?

At Lotto Horner was struggling to hold Cadel Evans’s wheel in the mountains. But at Astana he became one of the best climbers, and certainly a better pure climber than Evans - at 37? So his Vuelta win was like hey I got away with it so far so let’s go for broke before I retire. And it worked, except nobody would renew his contract.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: noob and SHAD0W93

He had a good engine.

This era is making it seem Froome was clean....or even armstrong.

Horner was probably the most ridiculous performance on that era.
No, Froome was the most ridiculous performance of the era, he just doesn't fit the definition to fit this thread. Ditto Thomas, because he's been consistently strong since his ludicrous transformation of style.

If he doesn't back it up, Sepp Kuss would, but he still has time to avoid that.

José Rujano's second time around might, but I think he's more a "couldn't stay healthy" guy that otherwise would have gone in one of the other two categories.

How about Ben King and Tomasz Marczynski emerging with multiple Vuelta stage wins?