The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ChewbaccaD said:
the sceptic said:why not? the guy is right. Danielson is no better than guys like Ricco and Rasmussen and I hope he goes away soon.
ChewbaccaD said:....uh...okay...
If you want to argue with someone about Tommy D, I'm sure someone will come along soon. IDGAF.
You know who gets an easier time than Danielson? The hundreds of dopers who haven't been caught in the first place.the sceptic said:right, well my point is that Danielson deserves all the heckling he gets.
he cheated his way to where he is now, and he is still doping by the looks of things. Yet he gets away easier than other dopers because he is one of the "good guys".
ChewbaccaD said:http://velonews.competitor.com/2014/08/news/cyclings-open-arena-harsh-words-reactions_342188
Hopefully, that isn't BroDeal, but if so, congratulations for making Velonews, the worldwide leader in boring, nationalistic cycling drivel!
hrotha said:You know who gets an easier time than Danielson? The hundreds of dopers who haven't been caught in the first place.
I don't think adding extra points to the Cons column of coming out will help.
westerner said:You know who had a harder time than Tommy D? The guys he cheated out of prize money and team spots (careers).
Good on the heckler. A local rider who does not like dopers in his sport and made a public display of it. Aren't the fans who willingly fawn over the dopers in the sport more detrimental to achieving the ideal of clean(er) sport?
pmcg76 said:Are you saying it's ok to cheer for a guy who might be as much a doper as Tommy D(or any doper for that matter) but hasn't been caught or implicated.
Jens Voigt has received a lot of plaudits and cheers in Colorado this week, I would bet the only difference between Voigt and Tommy D is one actually admitted to doping.
Singling out those who have been caught is unfair when there is the real possibility that many of those not caught are no different.
The only exception in my book is Armstrong and like many others that is more related to the non-doping stuff. Pre cancer doper Armstrong I could deal with, Cancer Jesus Lance, not a hope.
Also ironic how a pro rider who would have likely once held the same view as the heckler is now a big fan of Tommy D.
BYOP88 said:That's kinda true, but Danielson was having his balls squeezed when he sung. If he wasn't being squeezed he wouldn't have admitted and would be like all those other guys in the peloton who are 'praying' the closet door doesn't fly open.
Afrank said:I realize it's being said in jest, but it's not really appropriate to claim the person in the article is a forum poster. So I'm editing out the reference to the poster and this thread can be about Danielson getting heckled.
the sceptic said:Wasnt it Tilford that said Danielson was never a big talent to begin with? Yet somehow he magically manages to win both before and after he doped.
wannab said:
Race Radio said:It seems Kalan does not hate all dopers, just dopers who talk and hurt his buddies business
![]()
the sceptic said:good piece that. In stark contrast to his affidavit that paints him as a naive country boy that had no idea about doping before he arrived in europe. riiiight.
Danielson deserves all the heckling he gets.
We do know his stated motives to heckle him, though.the sceptic said:Why must you smear and cause conflict?
You dont know his motivation for calling Danielson a doper.
wannab said:
Jonathan, Tom wasn’t doing it because he didn’t have any other choice when he was “ready” to turn Pro, Tom was skipping all that. He was doing it to cheat his way into the sport. There is a huge difference there. But, he meets your guide lines, your stringent litmus test, so **** it.
Afrank said:I realize it's being said in jest, but it's not really appropriate to claim the person in the article is a forum poster. So I'm editing out the reference to the poster and this thread can be about Danielson getting heckled.
the sceptic said:Wasnt it Tilford that said Danielson was never a big talent to begin with? Yet somehow he magically manages to win both before and after he doped.
BroDeal said:Tilford'a view seems to be quite flexible when it comes to dopers. It all comes down to whether he likes the rider or whether they paid their dues or whether they are part of the good ol' boys network.
Multiple tests from multiple teams have shown TD has a big engine. Mentally it seems he is down there with five year old girls and Wiggins.
Race Radio said:TD is the perfect bike racer. Big engine, not so big intellect.
BroDeal said:Tilford'a view seems to be quite flexible when it comes to dopers. It all comes down to whether he likes the rider or whether they paid their dues or whether they are part of the good ol' boys network.
Multiple tests from multiple teams have shown TD has a big engine. Mentally it seems he is down there with five year old girls and Wiggins.