Ok, here's my opinion. I think the route is perfectly fine, as it is every year. The people pedalling the bikes make it a race, not the route design.[[content deleted]]
Really, so you think we'd have an all time great stages on stage 11 in 2022 and Giro stage 18 if organisers put some shallow climbs before or made an unipuerto stage? Or that stage 11 would be probably the best of the whole Tour this year had it finished on Puy Mary?
Of course not. Those stages were great because they had good design not just because riders made them great.
And that's the whole point of criticising that route. Not a single mountain stage invites for early action and every stage screams that the final climb is the best place to attack. Now the riders make the race but if you design your race so that the last climb should see all the meaningful action you're not helping the riders to make the race great. Especially if you don't design a first part of the race that creates a real time gaps, forcing riders to actually "make the race" early.
Last edited by a moderator: