Ukrainian team out of the Tour de l'Avenir. Two riders and two team members were arrested and placed in custody after illegal substances were found during a search at Besançon. The rest of the team have left the race.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
blackcat said:sobering that the first Ukraine rider on GC was 32nd.
would be a syllogism to assume that everyone above is charging, but, it puts it in perspective.
Epicycle said:I disagree with the statement in the Cyclingnews article that Actovegin is not on the WADA banned list. The banned list includes red blood cells of any origin and Actovegin is a hemoderivative of calf's blood.
Mellow Velo said:Actovegin: Another piece of tangible evidence of blood doping, against Armstrong.
Somewhere in France, July 2000, USPS caught dumping syringes of the stuff, miles from their Tour hotel.
Spotted by those damned frenchies and picked up by the gendarmes.
Only trouble was, not on the banned substance list, at that time.
Lausanne December 12th 2000. The IOC put it on the banned list.
http://archive.sportingnews.com/other/articles/20001212/280096.html
USPS/Armstrong
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...f-armstrong-controversy-is-banned-628598.html
Epicycle said:I disagree with the statement in the Cyclingnews article that Actovegin is not on the WADA banned list. The banned list includes red blood cells of any origin and Actovegin is a hemoderivative of calf's blood.
mektronic said:Check the UK Sport 100% ME program website, very comprehensive and says that Actovegin is no longer banned in or out of comp
mektronic said:Check the UK Sport 100% ME program website, very comprehensive and says that Actovegin is no longer banned in or out of comp
mektronic said:It was banned for a little while, then "unbanned" as a result of a specific study that found there was no effect, that's my understanding anyway.
I would trust the UK Sport/100% ME docs implicitly by the way as they've really done the legwork. Their A-Z list of substances is quite handy
Artificially enhancing the uptake, transport or delivery of oxygen, including
but not limited to perfluorochemicals, efaproxiral (RSR13) and modified
haemoglobin products (e.g. haemoglobin-based blood substitutes,
microencapsulated haemoglobin products).
I believe you just based on their race results.mektronic said:It was banned for a little while, then "unbanned" as a result of a specific study that found there was no effect, that's my understanding anyway.
...
I see. What confused me is that everything is prohibited by infusion which obviously includes Actovegin.mektronic said:It was banned for a little while, then "unbanned" as a result of a specific study that found there was no effect, that's my understanding anyway.
I would trust the UK Sport/100% ME docs implicitly by the way as they've really done the legwork. Their A-Z list of substances is quite handy
Cobblestones said:Utter nonsense. Check the WADA list page 6.
mektronic said:Yes, but the point is that they decided that the derivative Actovegin didn't artificially enhance the uptake of oxygen, regardless of its original base as a blood product.. E-mail WADA to ask if you like
Actovegin® also increases uptake and utilization of oxygen by hypoxic tissues and cells (which can be proven by Warburg's test) via promoting mitochondrial respiratory function and decreases formation of lactate, as a result, it protects hypoxic tissue. (Machicao, 1993; Kununaka et al. 1991)
Cobblestones said:From Nycomed's website (the guys who produce Actovegin)
I rest my case.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,23959039-23214,00.htmlActovegin is not on the World Anti-Doping Authority's (WADA) list of prohibited substances, but its use is restricted to intra-muscular injections and it is illegal when injected into a vein.
The Australian Sports Anti-Doping Authority (ASADA) warned athletes and professional footballers that anyone caught injecting Actovegin directly into their veins could face a two-year ban.
"It's not a prohibited substance but administering it intravenously is a prohibited method under the WADA code and that could result in a sanction," ASADA spokesman Simon Tidy said.
Epicycle said:We were incorrect on this Cobblestones. Mektronic is correct.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/story/0,8659,23959039-23214,00.html
Actovegin is only prohibited when given IV but that is just because everything is prohibited by IV unless a therapeutic exemption is given.
blackcat said:http://www.cyclingwebsite.net/coureuruitslagenfiche.php?coureurid=16831
Grabovskyy's palmares are as good as it gets in the espoirs and juniors. Like Popovych. Now a mediocre pro. The Jamie Burrow syndrome.
Think Burrow is still the best climber in the UK when on a program. They really should get him onto Sky. And he could tt on a program too.