Hoping that someone in USADA, or US GOV. bans this silliness. The only way the doping in sports would be funny is if Monty Python satirized it. http://www.bicycling.com/node/2108971
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
red_flanders said:Saw that, looks incredibly dumb. Not getting my time or money. Having a hard time believing it's even real.
This Charming Man said:Hoping that someone in USADA, or US GOV. bans this silliness. The only way the doping in sports would be funny is if Monty Python satirized it. http://www.bicycling.com/node/2108971
hrotha said:It looks bad, but why or how would anybody get it banned.![]()
Remarkable how quickly some people jump to remove the freedom of speech of others. What a hero!This Charming Man said:Hoping that someone in USADA, or US GOV. bans this silliness. The only way the doping in sports would be funny is if Monty Python satirized it. http://www.bicycling.com/node/2108971
It's satire. Don't you understand satire?SeriousSam said:Will cause viewers to have wrong views about the relative incidence of doping in cycling vs NFL/football/tennis etc
I'm wondering about his motives as well, the cynic in me thinks Armstrong is having a passive-aggressive go at Tyler Hamilton and any the other informants. Or he is just making fun of himself?DFA123 said:No surprise to see Lance involved in this terrible idea. Still trying to subtly push his 'everyone was at is - it was a level playing field' agenda.
Isn't laugher one of the stages of grief or did they rewrite that? If you can't laugh at yourself...Tricycle Rider said:I'm wondering about his motives as well
You really think Armstrong is laughing at himself? I mean, there's a first time for everything, but I find it so much more likely he's taking shots at someone else.fmk_RoI said:Isn't laugher one of the stages of grief or did they rewrite that? If you can't laugh at yourself...
carton said:You really think Armstrong is laughing at himself? I mean, there's a first time for everything, but I find it so much more likely he's taking shots at someone else.
Why do you assume it's laughing at himself? Why not assume he's laughing at the whole thing about doping? You see, the problem here is you seem to want Armstrong to be what people always wanted Armstrong to be: scheming, conniving, always with the ulterior motive. Some are so used to that mindset that they just can't let it go, everything has to be about Ty or Tygart or Betsy or whoever. Well, news: it doesn't have to be like that.carton said:You really think Armstrong is laughing at himself? I mean, there's a first time for everything, but I find it so much more likely he's taking shots at someone else.fmk_RoI said:Isn't laugher one of the stages of grief or did they rewrite that? If you can't laugh at yourself...
Oh FFS. Why not JV? It was JV who clung to anonymity, Ty went public (eventually).spalco said:carton said:You really think Armstrong is laughing at himself? I mean, there's a first time for everything, but I find it so much more likely he's taking shots at someone else.
In the trailer that was published he is directly mocking Tyler Hamilton imo.
1) No, except in the way one interview looks like another interview, in which case he's mocking oh I don't know, Bob Dylan or Lady Gaga or Johnny Depp; 2) You really don't do humour, do you, you're too busy speeding along on the sense of humour by-pass to smell the roses?spalco said:It doesn't look like the 60 minutes interview to you?
edited to add: not to mention the irony of Lance Armstrong playing the whistleblower in general.
fmk_RoI said:1) No, except in the way one interview looks like another interview, in which case he's mocking oh I don't know, Bob Dylan or Lady Gaga or Johnny Depp; 2) You really don't do humour, do you, you're too busy speeding along on the sense of humour by-pass to smell the roses?