Lopez had already burned his matches, while Mollema did a lot of work early.That was the impression I got. Were strong enough to be there but not enough to do anything so it feels like a legs issue rather than ridiculous tactics.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Lopez had already burned his matches, while Mollema did a lot of work early.That was the impression I got. Were strong enough to be there but not enough to do anything so it feels like a legs issue rather than ridiculous tactics.
It seems to be two things, race radio and the broadcast producerWhat is the background chatter on on Peacock? I can hear the race radio louder than Phil! Question when they say 321 break do they mean a commercial break or the breakaway?
Coquard does it. Narvaez looked by far the fastest but was boxed in.
depends on how you read the rule:I get why Narvaez was pissed, he went from the left side to the right side and boxed him in. I thought they had to sprint straight?
He needs to be more clever generally however. He lost "a lot" of race where he was the favorite during it.With Narvaez sprinting like this I can totally see him winning a cobbled classic this season and he has put himself into a great position to win the TDU overall too.
Or maybe the proper sprinters being absent was part of the problem today (although I acknowledge that DvP was the issue a couple of days ago. Pithie was the main cause of problems, and in a full bunch would have been nowhere near the front (he was out of the way in 47th on Tuesday)I am reminded, yet again, just how idiotic sprinting is. People take enormous risks with a couple of km to go (Ineos guy didn't and he go swamped and did not even smell the front afterwards), people are barging around, shoulder banging and in the end swerving like crazy. It is a wonder nobody went down... And to what end? Some sprint stage win. Frankly ridiculous. Road cycling should be about cycling power on the bike and not all about risk taking and positioning. Just make the parkour harder and all of this nonsense disappears. It is good that the heaviest of heavy guys were dropped today but the parkour needs to be a bit harder so that we get, what I believe to be, proper cycling and not this circus.
Seems like Pithie touches shoulders with anyone who gets near him, me not likey.What is Pithier even doing, riding like an amateur.
I too thought sprinters were supposed to stay in their lane once they launched, don't like the fuzzy, subject to interpretation wording of the rule.depends on how you read the rule:
"Riders shall be strictly forbidden to deviate from the lane they selected when launching into the sprint and, in so doing, endangering others."
Going by the usual way this is handled, I'd think there's reason to believe the "and" means a sprinter needs to do both to violate the rules, deviate and endanger. Coquard only deviated.
It should have happened much earlier, but I inexplicably dozed off at only about 20km to go. Fortunately I woke up at 2km to go, so I got to see the final sprint.Average 36km/h.....zzzzz...I'm staying up until midnight for this?
Geraint Thomas seems to think that because it's the Tour Down Under, the winner is the one who finishes at the bottom of the GC.