• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Tour Down Under 2025 - Men's (Jan. 21-26)

Page 15 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
I get why Narvaez was pissed, he went from the left side to the right side and boxed him in. I thought they had to sprint straight?
depends on how you read the rule:

"Riders shall be strictly forbidden to deviate from the lane they selected when launching into the sprint and, in so doing, endangering others."

Going by the usual way this is handled, I'd think there's reason to believe the "and" means a sprinter needs to do both to violate the rules, deviate and endanger. Coquard only deviated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Berniece
Jan 9, 2025
7
11
60
With Narvaez sprinting like this I can totally see him winning a cobbled classic this season and he has put himself into a great position to win the TDU overall too.
He needs to be more clever generally however. He lost "a lot" of race where he was the favorite during it.
 
I am reminded, yet again, just how idiotic sprinting is. People take enormous risks with a couple of km to go (Ineos guy didn't and he go swamped and did not even smell the front afterwards), people are barging around, shoulder banging and in the end swerving like crazy. It is a wonder nobody went down... And to what end? Some sprint stage win. Frankly ridiculous. Road cycling should be about cycling power on the bike and not all about risk taking and positioning. Just make the parkour harder and all of this nonsense disappears. It is good that the heaviest of heavy guys were dropped today but the parkour needs to be a bit harder so that we get, what I believe to be, proper cycling and not this circus.
 
I am reminded, yet again, just how idiotic sprinting is. People take enormous risks with a couple of km to go (Ineos guy didn't and he go swamped and did not even smell the front afterwards), people are barging around, shoulder banging and in the end swerving like crazy. It is a wonder nobody went down... And to what end? Some sprint stage win. Frankly ridiculous. Road cycling should be about cycling power on the bike and not all about risk taking and positioning. Just make the parkour harder and all of this nonsense disappears. It is good that the heaviest of heavy guys were dropped today but the parkour needs to be a bit harder so that we get, what I believe to be, proper cycling and not this circus.
Or maybe the proper sprinters being absent was part of the problem today (although I acknowledge that DvP was the issue a couple of days ago. Pithie was the main cause of problems, and in a full bunch would have been nowhere near the front (he was out of the way in 47th on Tuesday)
 
depends on how you read the rule:

"Riders shall be strictly forbidden to deviate from the lane they selected when launching into the sprint and, in so doing, endangering others."

Going by the usual way this is handled, I'd think there's reason to believe the "and" means a sprinter needs to do both to violate the rules, deviate and endanger. Coquard only deviated.
I too thought sprinters were supposed to stay in their lane once they launched, don't like the fuzzy, subject to interpretation wording of the rule.
 
At last the stage that many have been waiting for, place your bets, it's stage 5! (I'll just stick with Chaves [from about ten years ago] even though Narvaez or Romo would be much more prudent choices.)

For fans of maps here's one of stage 5 - they'll also be climbing Wickham Hill, but the long-awaited Willunga Hill they'll have to do twice.






 
  • Like
Reactions: postmanhat