I am not sure about the lawsuit but it will open Turter and Tan up for a lot of mud slingingthrawn said:I doubt this will see court. I imagine there will be an out of court settlement or the case will be dropped if SBS' legal team doesn't blink and stands by their comments.
Agreed, it will be funny to watch then fling poo at each other.sittingbison said:The funniest thing is Tan is an arse kissing lickspittle of the worst dopers in the history of the sport, and turned into a lilly livered quivering blanc menge over USADA vs Armstrong.
It could be demonstrated by a wily defence lawyer that if Tan thinks your'e a doper and says as much, then you must REALLY be a doper
That was some deal by Armstrong! Funded by tax payers to boot!Dear Wiggo said:Turtur unapologetically orchestrated paying Armstrong millions to roll around and win no stages of TDU on multiple occasions. Revolting.
Tan puts the boot into Aussie cyclists / teams (eg: Drapac) and is about as negative as a negative Nancy can get. He has the ideal face for radio and the perfect voice for mime. If I never see him commentating or "interviewing" again it will be too soon.
If someone can work out how to remove both of these people from cycling in Australia that would be the idea scenario. Don't make me tell you how I really feel.