• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Two Brits Lead the Tour de France

Must say, I'm suprised.

When Sky entered the peloton a few years ago, and said they wanted a Tour winner within 5 years (2014). I thought, wtf? Are they crazy? It was a ridicolous idea/plan
As there was no British rider at that moment even remotely close to the top GC riders in grand tours. Not the Tour, but not even in the Giro or Vuelta were they remotely close.

And now they are sitting 1-2 in the GC...with a track-rider turned GC rider and a Froome who pretty much came out of nowhere. Yes a talent, in the sense, he was a u23 rider who you would esitmate to become a normal pro, but nothing special.

They did an amazing job. It took them some trial and error, because in the first few years we also had some laughs with Sky tactics+mishaps. But they definitely got it right this year. You can only applaud them
 
Zam_Olyas said:
I think england should give more importance to cycling than football, football is just a hopeless situation at international level.

Football needs swimming coaches. Along with dedication and hard work. English players need to miss their kids birthday. Then they will dominate.
 
Dekker_Tifosi said:
They did an amazing job. It took them some trial and error, because in the first few years we also had some laughs with Sky tactics+mishaps. But they definitely got it right this year. You can only applaud them
Or! You could take it to the Clinic, where this belongs.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
Zam_Olyas said:
I think england should give more importance to cycling than football, football is just a hopeless situation at international level.

They should also stop wasting money on tennis. That's even more ridiculous. :eek:
 
Yeah, we had a good laugh about them three years ago, with their crazy plan to get a Brit to win the Tour within 5 years. And with Wiggo failing completely and utterly in his first Tour with Sky.

And here they are with not one but two Brits, pretty much getting to decide between them who will take home the yellow. It's funny, but somehow it also makes me a little sad about the apparent level of the competition. Is cycling really so much in the Dark Ages that you can enter the sport and utterly dominate the biggest race on the calendar in three years, simply by having better training methods? (this to steer clear from clinic stuff)
 
May 21, 2010
808
0
0
thehog said:
Football needs swimming coaches. Along with dedication and hard work. English players need to miss their kids birthday. Then they will dominate.

If you gonna troll the race threads for the umpteenth time this week with "cave" talk at least be original or funny
 
May 19, 2010
115
0
0
theyoungest said:
Is cycling really so much in the Dark Ages that you can enter the sport and utterly dominate the biggest race on the calendar in three years, simply by having better training methods? (this to steer clear from clinic stuff)

Am I missing the sarcasm here? Because posing that question doesn't seem to steer the discussion AWAY from the Clinic.
 
Califootman said:
Am I missing the sarcasm here? Because posing that question doesn't seem to steer the discussion AWAY from the Clinic.
This discussion is inevitably going to orbit the Clinic. But don't worry, we'll stick to the journo speech in this forum, so we should never quite land.

Say, those two Brits are being just incredible (wink wink nudge nudge), aren't they? Truly amaaaazing performance. Out of this planet.
 
theyoungest said:
And here they are with not one but two Brits, pretty much getting to decide between them who will take home the yellow. It's funny, but somehow it also makes me a little sad about the apparent level of the competition. Is cycling really so much in the Dark Ages that you can enter the sport and utterly dominate the biggest race on the calendar in three years, simply by having better training methods? (this to steer clear from clinic stuff)

No.

I'm sure Team Sky are very serious about training and all that, but other teams also use science to get better results. Dutch commentators are banging on about team Sky riding to a plan with wattages and stuff, but that's nothing new at all. In fact, Samu Sanchez started doing the same and that was the reason he was able to transform from a hilly puncheur to a climber, by measuring his efforts.

Only because Sky is a level above the rest the media is telling the story, but their scientific approach will give marginal results only (yes, pun and all that). Part of the reason why they are on top is also the weak competition with many big guns not present or injured, part may be clinic material.
 
Logic-is-your-friend said:
Whaaaa.... the Kenian and the Belgian are Brits now???

Just kidding. Good to see they made it before the 100th edition. Welcome to cycling boys :) Too bad there won't be a follow up for the foreseeable future.


Ah true, actually it's the born in Gent, Belgian, Bradley Wiggins winning the tour in front of the in Kenya made Chris Froome

Congrats to Belgium for having a nother possible gt winner :p
 
Apr 10, 2009
594
0
0
stampedingviking said:
Funniest thing is the reaction from the north Americans and Aussies on here :D

Yup, I agree. The Brits defending the exact same tactics/improvements they absolutely abhorred just a few years ago and the Americans getting to see exactly what the Brits were foaming at the mouth about then.......
 
There is a tear in my eye. But that is just because I haven't stopped laughing since the ITT.

And BTW, a little advice, stop trying to out English the other English trolls on here, leave that to Sunset, Trunnions and the others, you just come across as a complete amateur. Leave it to the experts.
 
Jul 8, 2010
10
0
0
Sky Envy

Sky is in an eviable position with 1 & 2 in GC. Yet they're taking hits on all fronts except from rival teams. Journalists criticize them to fabricate drama while some fans either question their fair play or who their leader should be.

The team's stars seem aligned in the Sky this year. The had good luck with limited damage from the first week's crashes. The supporting riders are doing a tremedous job and have a second rider atop GC. And some thought that it's only exclusive to the Schlecks. Great teamwork and team direction and support. The rival teams will analyze the planning, preparation and rider selection that Sky used for future Tour strategy.
 
theyoungest said:
Yeah, we had a good laugh about them three years ago, with their crazy plan to get a Brit to win the Tour within 5 years. And with Wiggo failing completely and utterly in his first Tour with Sky.

And here they are with not one but two Brits, pretty much getting to decide between them who will take home the yellow. It's funny, but somehow it also makes me a little sad about the apparent level of the competition. Is cycling really so much in the Dark Ages that you can enter the sport and utterly dominate the biggest race on the calendar in three years, simply by having better training methods? (this to steer clear from clinic stuff)

I think the main reason for their dominance this year is that there is a new generation climbers coming inn that is still a couple of years too young (Pinot) and a generation climbers that is a couple of years to old (Basso). So per now there is only two elite climbers in the whole peloton and noone of them are racing the tour this year, so the lack of real attacks matches atleast Wiggos style of climbing so perfect that it might look easier than it actually is.
 
Arnout said:
No.

I'm sure Team Sky are very serious about training and all that, but other teams also use science to get better results. Dutch commentators are banging on about team Sky riding to a plan with wattages and stuff, but that's nothing new at all. In fact, Samu Sanchez started doing the same and that was the reason he was able to transform from a hilly puncheur to a climber, by measuring his efforts.

Only because Sky is a level above the rest the media is telling the story, but their scientific approach will give marginal results only (yes, pun and all that). Part of the reason why they are on top is also the weak competition with many big guns not present or injured, part may be clinic material.
I don't care what Dutch commentators say, the Dutch are always crazy about everything that speaks English. The fact is that Sky have brought on a swimming trainer, who clearly has some different ideas about peaking, and apparently those ideas really work. It's not just Wiggo and Froome you know, who are really strong right now. Porte crashed, really bad as well, and whereas the Rabo boys and some others didn't recover at all from that crash, Porte still has the form to seriously hurt the peloton before Froomey and Wiggo take over.

Of course, if Contador were here we'd have a totally different situation, but still Sky as a team are simply a level above the others.
 

TRENDING THREADS