• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

UCI helped Froome with illegal(?) TUE at Romandie

40mg per day!!!

What is he? A cow? That's a truck load of steroid!

I thought he reduced his saddle height for his back problem? Not take horse steroids to race again.

Man this guy is a walking medicine cabinet. Just as well a Walsh had already revealed this in his column in the Sunday Times.

Sky's backdated perscription moment? (Check).
 
Sep 18, 2010
375
0
0
So the usual PED rules don't apply to Sky? The UCI just swept them away, rather than risk Froome not riding?

If only there was a Brit running the UCI, that would put a stop to these dodgy goings on...
 
Dec 11, 2013
1,138
0
0
thehog said:
Sky's backdated perscription moment? (Check).


Whatever it was, it wasn't 'backdated'

Ahead of the Tour de Romandie, Le Journal du Dimanche reports, Sky team doctor Alan Farrell requested
 
Dec 18, 2013
241
0
0
thehog said:
40mg per day!!!

What is he? A cow? That's a truck load of steroid!

I thought he reduced his saddle height for his back problem? Not take horse steroids to race again.

It's no more than I would issue to a COPD patient with exacerbation of their condition.
30-40 mg\day is the therapeutic dose in that scenario (6-8 tablets).

Similar amount to that which my mother takes for Polymyalgia too, less of the hyperbole please.
 
TailWindHome said:
Whatever it was, it wasn't 'backdated'

Ahead of the Tour de Romandie, Le Journal du Dimanche reports, Sky team doctor Alan Farrell requested

Whatever it was?

It was an illegal TUE

And of course you missed that I was drawing a comparison between Armstrong's cosy relationship with the UCI and Froome.

Are you sure you didn't to go school with Richie Porte? :rolleyes:
 
Nov 17, 2009
221
0
0
Armstrong starts looking like choirboy when comparing to man of constant marginal gains Chris "Inhaler" Froome. What stuff is that guy not on :confused:
 
deviant said:
It's no more than I would issue to a COPD patient with exacerbation of their condition.
30-40 mg\day is the therapeutic dose in that scenario (6-8 tablets).

Similar amount to that which my mother takes for Polymyalgia too, less of the hyperbole please.

Froome has Polymyalgia?

Lucky he was at home resting and not out winning a bike race :rolleyes:
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
Now we have some EVIDENCE that the UCI are bending the rules in favor of sky. Just begs the question what else they are letting sky get away with.

Also, how on earth is Zorzoli still there?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
the sceptic said:
Now we have some EVIDENCE that the UCI are bending the rules in favor of sky. Just begs the question what else they are letting sky get away with.

Also, how on earth is Zorzoli still there?

It has long been suspected that Sky were in cahoots with ASO and UCI, this is just a flicker of flame from all that smoke we have been seeing.
 
Sep 3, 2012
638
0
0
wattage said:
Armstrong starts looking like choirboy when comparing to man of constant marginal gains Chris "Inhaler" Froome. What stuff is that guy not on :confused:

What was it actually needed for? Was it the 'bad back' episode? My memory is poor when it comes to Froome and his ailments.
 
Bexon30 said:
What was it actually needed for? Was it the 'bad back' episode? My memory is poor when it comes to Froome and his ailments.

There was the back episode. Then at Romandie he was beaten in the prologue. Took his 40mg per day and smashed the mountain stage with a *** attack and killed the ITT.

Not bad.
 
Dec 18, 2013
241
0
0
thehog said:
Froome has Polymyalgia?

Lucky he was at home resting and not out winning a bike race :rolleyes:

Weird extrapolation of my post.

I was merely pointing out that 40 mg Pred is not a 'cow's dose' and there are several conditions where these doses are advocated..... but then you knew that already, it just didn't fit your narrative eh?
 
thehog said:
There was the back episode. Then at Romandie he was beaten in the prologue. Took his 40mg per day and smashed the mountain stage with a *** attack and killed the ITT.

Not bad.

Yes. It was time for someone to see this. Plus, before this TUE from April he was a donkey in the mountains for all his carrier, same with TT, not better not worse than Cavendish.
Finally the connections are made.
 
Jul 17, 2012
5,303
0
0
This thread is just going to run and run isn't it.

Shoddy from Sky if true, but this is just a newspaper report so far right?
 
Jul 21, 2012
9,860
3
0
JimmyFingers said:
This thread is just going to run and run isn't it.

Shoddy from Sky if true, but this is just a newspaper report so far right?

I struggle to see how Froome could be any cleaner. Dont worry Jimmy, still never tested positive right?
 
Mar 12, 2009
2,521
0
0
the sceptic said:
Now we have some EVIDENCE that the UCI are bending the rules in favor of sky. Just begs the question what else they are letting sky get away with.

Also, how on earth is Zorzoli still there?

That's a very good question.
Here's an interesting article on Cookson, Zorzoli etc. (in Spanish)
 
Feb 10, 2014
642
0
0
Are you guys on Twitter? We could send an army of critical fans to ask the UCI officials a few questions.
 
Dec 7, 2010
5,507
0
0
JimmyFingers said:
this is just a newspaper report so far right?

Yup

washington-post-watergate1.jpg
 
Jun 29, 2009
127
0
0
emergency TUEs are always granted for exacerbations of asthma:



he is asthmatic, he had a respiratory infection

a respiratory infection in asthmatics can lead to an acute exacerbation of asthma

and acute exacerbations of asthma are no joke, they can send you straight to accident and emergency if badly treated or not treated at all

therefore, athletes with an acute exacerbation of asthma have the right to an emergency TUE, in fact they even have the right to a retroactive TUE if necessary. this is clearly stated in the WADA paperwork

http://www.wada-ama.org/Documents/Science_Medicine/Medical_info_to_support_TUECs/WADA-Medical-info-Asthma-5.0-EN.pdf

so i'm surprised they are making such a fuss about it


... unless this is to do with his status as an asthmatic either not being registered or not having been renewed, which is another story altogether