- Aug 13, 2009
- 12,855
- 1
- 0
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The UCI had no problem bending their own rules to allow Armstrong race the Tour Down Under in 2009.Mambo95 said:You can't blame the UCI to sticking to their own rules (see rule 2.1.003 for example).
Then they should be punished.Mambo95 said:The fault here lies with the race organisers.
AntonioRossi said:This is just plain wrong, but what good can you expect from the UCI anymore these days...
Fetisoff said:Ok. Not gonna score any "forum points" on this one, but
![]()
Fetisoff said:Ok. Not gonna score any "forum points" on this one, but
![]()
El Pistolero said:I don't want to justify what the UCI did here, but do we really want someone at the Olympics that got the bulk of her points because she won the national title for a small country/island 3 times in a row?
But as I said, UCI shows it true colours once again. Shouldn't have taken those Venezuela points away. That's like taking Niels Albert's UCI points for cyclo-cross away because it wasn't international enough.
Race Radio said:Yes.
The Olympics are about "The Countries of the World" their stated goal is to link the global community through sport. This means you do not have 20 Kenyans in the Marathon, 6 Americans in the 100, or 5 US Basketball teams. Instead you have teams from countries big and small
Froome19 said:So silly and petty.
It seems the UCI is mucking up all their qualifications for olympics. just look at track cycling:
Only 1 representative from each country! That means that of the top 4 in the mens sprint last year only 2 can qualify!
Also the defending sprint champion (hoy) will in most probable circumstance not qualify as he's battling against Kenny (world champion).
I feel the UCI are contradicting themselves by on the track trying to make it more multicultural (by limiting top nations places) and then on the road not letting lower nations riders qualify!
El Pistolero said:But the world isn't a perfect global community and it will never become one. Ever heard of the "race to the bottom"?
I'd rather see the best athletes of the world compete against each other instead of wasting spots to athletes who only qualified because they live in a very small nation. But if she's capable of beating a more international field or compete evenly with them, then by all means let her go!
So someone who is better and worked harder than this lady isn't allowed to go because she's from France(for example)? How is that any fairer?
I don't care what ideology the Olympic games have or want to have. Tell me one ideology that perfectly worked/works in practice.
This reminds me of the European championship cross(athletics) where some dude from Monaco had to give up after a few laps while puking the place under.
But ok... Just my opinion, you have every right to want her there I suppose.
Race Radio said:You already have these races, they are called the World Championships.
If you do not allow small countries to take part then there is no reason for the Olympics.