this struck me as a more genuine antidoping sound coming from this guy Uli Fluhme who organizes the New York Gran Fondo:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/b/3799065c-b2ea-4818-9219-4f3e711bd5d5
in 2013 his race had two EPO positives (both riders admitted), leading to this interesting interview:
on a side, he also twitters stuff i tend to agree with:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/b/3799065c-b2ea-4818-9219-4f3e711bd5d5
in 2013 his race had two EPO positives (both riders admitted), leading to this interesting interview:
http://nyvelocity.com/content/interviews/2013/nyc-gran-fondos-uli-fluhmeNYVC: First off, what was your reaction to learning that two of your participants (David Anthony and Gabriele Guarini) had tested positive for EPO?
Uli Fluhme: Two EPO positives were a surprise because in-competiition (IC) testing is rarely expected to bring a positive result, let alone two (out of 10 tested). When USADA first told Lidia and I about the positive tests, we wondered if it would be someone blaming some obscure substance from the prohibited list that was in their tainted supplements. But EPO can only enter the body via injection, hence being obvious and deliberate doping. With finite "glow" periods and techniques like microdosing, it's too easy to avoid testing positive if you know when you might get tested. But Anthony said he was too arrogant about it and Guarini didn't know we would test.
on a side, he also twitters stuff i tend to agree with:
Uli Fluhme @ulif
@PaulKimmage @cyclistdata @Vaughters @Digger_forum Naughty Vaughty is the impersonification of hypocrisy
Uli Fluhme @ulif ? Mar 3
Now Driouch gets investigated while it should be @Mo_Farah. WTF?