• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Van Dessel Full Tilt Boogie Review

Mar 10, 2009
1,384
0
0
Visit site
I have searched through this review three times for a price for the model reviewed. The review refers on at least two occasions to the models as being 'pricey' but does not reference any amount. Neither is there a link to the Van Dessel website to make finding out this essential piece of information easier for CN readers. Now, I'm a self-starter so can tell you that the price for the model reviewed is us $3999.

Just in case you were curious :mad:
 
Apr 22, 2009
6
0
0
Visit site
I too, have reread that review trying to find the price as its mentioned 3 times i think. Thought it must have been a $10k bike.
Seems the bike only comes in size 54cm, which is printed about 100 times.:confused:
 
Mar 10, 2009
1,384
0
0
Visit site
RDV4ROUBAIX said:
Van Dessel lists the FTB at $3499 on their website. IMHO, they are kind of a rip-off. Cute, but waaay too pricey for what you're getting. Sorry. :(

$3499 for Rival
$3999 for Force
:(:confused:


Personally, if I was going carbon, I would invest my cash in a Stevens Carbon Team or a Ridley X Fire. I'm interested in seeing how Cannondale go with the SuperX though. And the Ibis Hakkalugi is pretty as a picture :)
 
Mar 19, 2009
2,703
3
0
www.ridemagnetic.com
Yep, and as stated in the review the wheels (Sun) that came on that bike are egregiously out of place on a bike that costs that much. It's almost like a bad joke on the end user. If there ever was a fine example of a company caring more about profits rather than equipping with proper gear, it's this one. I can ballpark what that f&f costs Van Dessel, least they could do is put a proper wheelset on there.
 
Mar 10, 2009
1,384
0
0
Visit site
RDV4ROUBAIX said:
Just noticed this; that the front der is routed on the down tube, everything else on the top. Pure CX bikes run everything on the top.

I'm not sure that I would wholly endorse this. Stevens route their front and rear on the d/t. Ridley route the X Fire via t/t but the X Night concelaed via the d/t :confused: Cannondale via d/t too. The new Kona Major Jake runs d/t but have made the cable run partly concealed to help with lifts I presume.

D/t routing tends to make for shorter runs hence less cable friction. With sealed cables now being widely available the t/t routing to avoid contamination is less of a concern. For me, it's only a question of how comfortable do you want/need your d/t grabs to be?

I don't think that cable routing wins or loses many races. Fwiw, I prefer the aesthetics of t/t routing but I race s/s so what do I care? :D
 
May 20, 2010
801
0
0
Visit site
LugHugger said:
I'm not sure that I would wholly endorse this. Stevens route their front and rear on the d/t. Ridley route the X Fire via t/t but the X Night concelaed via the d/t :confused: Cannondale via d/t too. The new Kona Major Jake runs d/t but have made the cable run partly concealed to help with lifts I presume.

D/t routing tends to make for shorter runs hence less cable friction. With sealed cables now being widely available the t/t routing to avoid contamination is less of a concern. For me, it's only a question of how comfortable do you want/need your d/t grabs to be?

I don't think that cable routing wins or loses many races. Fwiw, I prefer the aesthetics of t/t routing but I race s/s so what do I care? :D

I prefer dt routing. Much better shifting, especially when it's muddy.
Those little freaking pulleys mounted behind the seat tube really collect the crud.
 
Mar 11, 2009
18
0
0
Visit site
fletch62 said:
I too, have reread that review trying to find the price as its mentioned 3 times i think. Thought it must have been a $10k bike.
Seems the bike only comes in size 54cm, which is printed about 100 times.:confused:

I've just bought one of these frames in the 56cm size. The deciding thing for me was the geometry. I've been racing VD's G&T frame for the last three years and really liked it. There's a lot to be said for having a pit bike with identical geometry. It's also a beautiful frame. It came out to 17.75 lbs with fairly ordinary parts. Front end is quite stiff as advertised.
 
Trigon

RDV4ROUBAIX said:
True. Guess I just prefer tt cable routing. Had 1 CX bike with dt routing and hated it for racing.

My last, old, old bike had downtube routing and I didn't like it. Grabbing at the downtube is weird with the cables there. I don't like how the mud collects on that pulley either. Note to self, look into a top pull front mech.

Like another post said, either way it's not terribly important.

Finally, that's a Trigon product. Nice bike, but it has all the signature elements of a Trigon. The seat stay assembly, gently sloping top tube, generally aggressive angles. Expensive? Maybe. It just depends on how much service/warranty the guy running Van Dessel commits to. I don't see any warranty info on their site.

I'm a fan of the Fort brand. I fancy the gentler angles in their 'cross product. http://www.fortbicycles.com