The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
BotanyBay said:First we've got Armstrong being a bedroom closer by saying it to Lemond's too-young daughter, and now we've got Vaughters trying to say it to us.
roundabout said:Yes, context please.
BotanyBay said:Vaughter's recent interview regarding Contador. Mister "I'll never get upset about doping" always stands in between the groups, preaching peace and not jumping to conclusions. But really, he's the oil slick behind the batmobile. Sent to slow everyone down and obfuscate the situation. I wouldn't be surprised if McQuaid himself asked Vaughters to get on the horn and get it out there that there is some improvement to the situation.
Context? Vaughters telling us to relax is like Armstrong telling Simone Lemond to relax when she got creeped-out after she caught him stalking her on Twitter.
Vaughters is the designated "anti-doping" guy the UCI sends out to "manage" the problem of doping. No one believes McQuaid, so they send Vaughters. Look at Kimmage's interview today. He's not accusing Vaughters of anything, but I'm willing to do so. Vaughters is the guy that the UCI uses to help "manage" doping (as opposed to fighting it). Vaughters has done a fine job of establishing a fake credibility with the press and the fans. Many of them consider him to the the voice of clean racing. And when they need the "big quote", many of the journos turn to him. But everything he's saying is just "managed crap" for a 100% managed situation.
BotanyBay said:First we've got Armstrong being a bedroom closer by saying it to Lemond's too-young daughter, and now we've got Vaughters trying to say it to us.
NashbarShorts said:So in other words, you're a Vaughters fan?
I look at it this way...Obama initially went to work in the innercity b/c he wanted to make a difference. After awhile, he realized you can't make a difference unless you're in a position of power. Thus, entry into politics.
Vaughter, likewise. He could sit outside the sport and wish there was a clean option for riders, or he could get involved. He now commands a multi-million $$ budget, provides employment for a lot of riders, and is the head of the AIGCP. I'd say all things considered, he's doing a lot more to promote clean cycling than ANY of us here...
NashbarShorts said:So in other words, you're a Vaughters fan?
I look at it this way...Obama initially went to work in the innercity b/c he wanted to make a difference. After awhile, he realized you can't make a difference unless you're in a position of power. Thus, entry into politics.
Vaughter, likewise. He could sit outside the sport and wish there was a clean option for riders, or he could get involved. He now commands a multi-million $$ budget, provides employment for a lot of riders, and is the head of the AIGCP. I'd say all things considered, he's doing a lot more to promote clean cycling than ANY of us here...
NashbarShorts said:AIGCP is the only united voice the riders have. Who would you rather have running it? Someone who is (relatively) outspoken about the problem of doping, or someone who merely mutters "it's a bad day for cycling..." everytime a scandal occurs?