Velonews article FAIL!

[SetonHallPirate]

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012...-to-watch-in-this-years-tour-de-france_225803

Seriously? They wrote an article saying "Nine North American riders to watch in this year's Tour de France", and don't even bother mentioning that there are exactly nine North American riders appearing in the Tour. Utterly hilarious, if you ask me. (yes, I realize that this is their far superior competitor's website)

 

[ElChingon]

Can you remove the word article from your title? That way we can put them all here.

 

[cineteq]

http://velonews.competitor.com/2012...-to-watch-in-this-years-tour-de-france_225803

Seriously? They wrote an article saying "Nine North American riders to watch in this year's Tour de France", and don't even bother mentioning that there are exactly nine North American riders appearing in the Tour. Utterly hilarious, if you ask me. (yes, I realize that this is their far superior competitor's website)

If so, what's your point? How about changing the title to Americans riding the Tour?

 

[SetonHallPirate]

If so, what's your point? How about changing the title to Americans riding the Tour?

Yes, if they did that, that would be OK. But to say "Nine North Americans to watch", when there are only nine North Americans in the race, just sounds ridiculous.

 

[soOpOSMthanks!]

Yeah...no. This post is fflippin' stupid. What's hilarious is that you find this whole thing hilarious.

 

[cineteq]

Yes, if they did that, that would be OK. But to say "Nine North Americans to watch", when there are only nine North Americans in the race, just sounds ridiculous.

Actually, I was addressing my answer to you

 

[SetonHallPirate]

Right...you translated my point into actual English, rather than whatever language I had made it in.

 

[Rocksteady]

Crazy thing is, everyone of the North American in the race are Stage winners, Top 10 finishers, or Jersey wearers. There are 0 NAs that are Pack fillers