The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
roundabout said:https://www.sudinfo.be/id117424/article/2019-05-07/vinokourov-nie-toute-corruption-pour-sa-victoire-en-2010-lors-de-liege-bastogne
lol - 'loaned in cash'
Likely to be suspended sentences, if anthing. The €100,000 fine for for V and the €50,000 for K, on top of seizing the original €150,000 bribe, will do more damage. Although, if a guilty verdict, then surely the UCI will have to rewrite the result, they've been saying they were waiting for the court case to complete before they did anything, haven't they?Haven't followed the case too closely, but stumbled on this today, both can face short prison time plus fines:
sports.yahoo.com/amphtml/vinokourov-could-face-jail-allegedly-fixing-cycling-race-153023213--spt.html
Although, if a guilty verdict, then surely the UCI will have to rewrite the result
DeetsA Belgian court has cleared Alexander Vinokourov and Alexander Kolobnev of fraud, with the judge ruling there was a lack of concrete evidence to show that the Astana team manager bought off the former Russian rider to win the 2010 edition of Liège-Bastogne-Liège.
Why is that story only reaching the Comic a full month after everyone else had it?Case closed, not guilty.
Vino option?Why is that story only reaching the Comic a full month after everyone else had it?
If you took the time to read it, you'd see that the new news is that the appeal has been rejected, and you will see a link that they ran the story of him being cleared on 5th November. Why so negative?Why is that story only reaching the Comic a full month after everyone else had it?