dolophonic said:
i don't need to look at a web site, i have ridden it. It is 1 in 3..
.
That's a bit short for an answer. To be believed you have to make an intelligent comment about the profile shown in this fairly respected website
http://www.climbbybike.com/profile.a...ountainID=7382
which shows than the first and steeper kilometer rises only 160 meters., ie 16%.Of course if you measure the elevation in feet, ie about 525 feet, and the road distance in meters, ie 1000 meters before dividing, you would get 52 %
Let's assume you didn't mix up units.
To convince us you could find for us on the web an ordnance survey map of that hill where we could read the elevation and estimate the distance.
Climbybike did a reasonable job on the somewhat similar La Bastille climb (Grenoble) mentioned earlier and which I know
http://www.climbbybike.com/climb.asp?Col=Montee-de-la-Bastille&qryMountainID=12378
No reasonable cyclist would ever see the 30% mentioned as the maximum, because no such cyclist would ever ride on the inside of the switchbacks. They would feel at most a 22-25% gradient in the middle/ outside of those switchbacks.
I have no reason to believe they would be fairly realistic on La Bastille and yet be totally wrong on Hardknott.
Anyway, to get an appreciation of what 30% gradient means, next time you are in San Francisco, just take your rental car up the likes of Filbert street ( I wouldn't do it in my own car, but it was thrilling doing it in a rented one) and not Filbert's itsef which I believe is one-way down.
PS
http://www.visitcumbria.com/wc/hardknott-pass.htm
This website gives the ordnance survey map
number , but not the map itself.
The very nice pictures show that the slope is fairly steady, on the
inside of the tightest hairpin you could possibly reach 30% over 5 meters or so.