• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

What races do you consider to be under rated?

May 6, 2009
8,522
1
0
No enough credit for how good they are, either by the fans, or the general media, or whatever reasons you like.

I've always thought races like the Volta a Portugal doesn't get as much credit as it should for producing entertaining racing, and some challenging terrain (plus some scorching August heat), has been around for 72 editions and was considered for a long time 'the 4th GT', an ideal preparation for teams and riders to get used to multi week stage racing, plus from English media outlets (like CN), you hear squat about the race, nothing in the way of TV coverage on Eurosport, barely any media reports, and the post stage articles were lacking detail of what happened and race photos, just thank God for people like Libertine and DAOTEC to keep us up to date on info. Isso, does the race get a lot of media coverage in Portugal, particularly in the north, where cycling is popular?

Other then the Volta, I'll put in the Tour of Austria, unfortunately they hold their race in July (usually the day after the Tour de France starts), but they are not afraid to give the 1st stage to the sprinters, and then the next day to send them up the Großglockner. It generally has some good racing and a good field as well. Shame this has nearly died.

Now I've given my reasons for the first two, and hear me out on this, and before you laugh me off the forum (it was nice knowing you guys and girls :(), but I actually consider the Giro d'Italia to be under rated. Why? Not by the fans, the riders and teams, or if you're Johan Bruyneel, you don't rate this race at all, the cycling media, but the general media it's self, especially if you're in what Pat McQuaid likes to call the "new world of cycling". Fellow Australians, New Zealander's, South Africans, Americans, Canadians, Brits, Irish, and where ever else cycling is not popular (compared to rugby, basketball etc.), can probably attest to the fact that in July, in the newspapers and on the sports section of the nightly news report, they will give a brief account of what happened, or if you're lucky like we in Australia are with SBS, we get every stage live, and in general, Tour de France = cycling, everybody knows about the Tour de France, but if you ask them about the Giro d'Italia, unless they are a cycling fan in some way, they will have NFI what you're on about. Even though the Giro >>>>>>> the Tour in every way humanely possible, except for the size of the race, it simply doesn't rate a mention.

I also think that with the Tour being the pinnacle, and so many riders and team putting their focus towards July, the Giro tends to suffer in lack of big name GC riders riding FTW (we never saw Armstrong there during his 7-year reign, no Schlecks etc.), or if they ride at all. In terms of being a spectacle and entertaining, the Giro has it in spades that ASO could only wish for. I was on the edge of my seat watching Nibali and Arroyo descending like madmen off the Monte Grappa, and the Mortirolo respectively, with a middle finger directed at self preservation, but if I opened up a newspaper here, or looked on the news, I wouldn't know about it.

So that is my reasons I've put out there, agree or disagree all you like, or if you have other races that should be included.
 
I think that compared to the monuments and the GTs most other races are underrated. It seems like a lot of people are entirely focused on these races and results in other races are completely irrelavant to some people. This is especially true for most 1.1 and 1.HC one day races.
 
Mar 19, 2010
221
0
9,030
I'd add:

Tro Bro Leon: Le petit roubaix

Vuelta as Asturias: Epic race, big mountains, good riders.

Tour of Britain: Great race, lively. Should be held in higher esteem. I think it isn't because it such an uncertain race. It needs some pavé or something.

Volta ao Algarve: A tune up race, but it's where top riders begin to show their cards. It should at least be on tv
 
Apr 8, 2010
1,257
0
0
The Hitch said:
Tour of Germany

How can a defunct race be underrated?

Any other race than TdF is underrated in the general public. Apart from that i guess it's a matter of preference.
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
the volta for sure.

I agree with craig and the whole giro thing (same goes for many great races though; P-R, Flanders, Vuelta etc). Though it comes down to cycling being underrated (or unappreciated?) on a whole really - i mean in countries like Australia.

Critérium International is an epic race, hardly gets a mention. Tour du Haut-Var is anther I agree with ^^
Personally I think the PT does not really indicate (yes the biggest are there, maybe minus Het Volk) the best races, I would replace quite a few with more deserved races.That being said, the PT is a joke as we all know, and not being PT is actually a good thing my opinion... :D

@hitch
I'm still pretty annoyed that there is no Deutschland Tour anymore (although, as history suggests, it was always an unstable race). I also miss Zürich :mad:
And screw eneco, bring back Ronde van Nederland. Blah !
But yeah I might be getting off topic here :p
 
volta a portugal no doubt.

it does get a good coverage in portugal but only by the 1 public channel. and even then they show 2 hours of girls dancing and only 1 hour of racing. if you want to watch the full race you must have cable to watch one of the subchannels of said public channel.

and that is sad when the race always has great courses(even tho they could be more inventive) and really hard conditions(just ask gibo :p )

oh and for some dumb reason they lowered the number of stages. it used to be 15 stages iirc and now its a lot less.

can any1 give me a reason why the volta isn't a protour race and races where hardly anything interesting happens like eneco tour and tour of california are? and before the ToC fans start, watch and volta first before you say anything about it. i watched last years ToC and it was worse then the volta in all aspects
 
Definately Volta a Portugal and Vuelta a Colombia. Also, i'd like to mention the Hel van het Mergelland, tough the flat final makes it a (group) sprint many times, it has actually more hills in 200km than the Amstel Gold Race in 260km, same region
 
Mar 26, 2009
2,532
1
0
Id go with the already mentioned:

Volta a Portugal
Vuelta Asturias (very exciting race)
Giro dell'Emilia (UCI's fault)
 
Hmmm... Portugal is an obvious, but perfectly good, choice. I've also always liked the Tour of Belgium, which always produces at least two great stages every year. For instance their mini-classic stage this year which Ben Hermans won was some real exciting racing.

Another Belgian race which I think doesn't get enough respect is the Brabantse Pijl. Although this year, on this forum at least, got a lot of attention.
 
craig1985 said:
... I actually consider the Giro d'Italia to be under rated. Why? Not by the fans, the riders and teams, or if you're Johan Bruyneel, you don't rate this race at all, the cycling media, but the general media it's self, especially if you're in what Pat McQuaid likes to call the "new world of cycling". Fellow Australians, New Zealander's, South Africans, Americans, Canadians, Brits, Irish, and where ever else cycling is not popular (compared to rugby, basketball etc.), can probably attest to the fact that in July, in the newspapers and on the sports section of the nightly news report, they will give a brief account of what happened, or if you're lucky like we in Australia are with SBS, we get every stage live, and in general, Tour de France = cycling, everybody knows about the Tour de France, but if you ask them about the Giro d'Italia, unless they are a cycling fan in some way, they will have NFI what you're on about. Even though the Giro >>>>>>> the Tour in every way humanely possible, except for the size of the race, it simply doesn't rate a mention.

I also think that with the Tour being the pinnacle, and so many riders and team putting their focus towards July, the Giro tends to suffer in lack of big name GC riders riding FTW (we never saw Armstrong there during his 7-year reign, no Schlecks etc.), or if they ride at all. In terms of being a spectacle and entertaining, the Giro has it in spades that ASO could only wish for. I was on the edge of my seat watching Nibali and Arroyo descending like madmen off the Monte Grappa, and the Mortirolo respectively, with a middle finger directed at self preservation, but if I opened up a newspaper here, or looked on the news, I wouldn't know about it.

Good point, well presented.

Agree completely.
I'd heard of the Giro before moving to the UK, but since then have "discovered" this GT over the past few years. A fantastic event and one I'd prefer to go to over the Tour anyday.
This race alone is one major reason why I don't want to move back to Australia.
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
Moondance said:
Hmmm... Portugal is an obvious, but perfectly good, choice. I've also always liked the Tour of Belgium, which always produces at least two great stages every year. For instance their mini-classic stage this year which Ben Hermans won was some real exciting racing.

Another Belgian race which I think doesn't get enough respect is the Brabantse Pijl. Although this year, on this forum at least, got a lot of attention.

These two sprang to mind for me also.
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
Michele said:
Id go with the already mentioned:

Volta a Portugal
Vuelta Asturias (very exciting race)
Giro dell'Emilia (UCI's fault)

It's annoying that we cant even get tv coverage for races like Emilia
 
Sep 12, 2010
32
0
0
Strade bianche/mpe.

I know it's not the cobbles, but gravel + hills= win!!

Might be a silly question... But why has there never been a "proper" classics style field contesting this race. I've never seen live footage (the bonus of living in such a cycling mad country as Australia :p ) but from the pictures and the reports, it seems like the perfect race to *one day* become a monument??
 
Jun 22, 2009
10,644
2
0
I'm not convinced gravel is as effective as some may think (gravel is certainly no P-R), the race is epic irregardless. But if it's raining, then yeah.. it's pretty amazing :D

and unfortunate I don't think there was any coverage this year at all... poor.
Certainly underrated, but still a young race.
 
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
I'm not convinced gravel is as effective as some may think (gravel is certainly no P-R), the race is epic irregardless. But if it's raining, then yeah.. it's pretty amazing :D

and unfortunate I don't think there was any coverage this year at all... poor.
Certainly underrated, but still a young race.

I think there was delayed coverage of about an hour of the race.
 
Parrulo said:
volta a portugal no doubt.

it does get a good coverage in portugal but only by the 1 public channel. and even then they show 2 hours of girls dancing and only 1 hour of racing. if you want to watch the full race you must have cable to watch one of the subchannels of said public channel.

and that is sad when the race always has great courses(even tho they could be more inventive) and really hard conditions(just ask gibo :p )

oh and for some dumb reason they lowered the number of stages. it used to be 15 stages iirc and now its a lot less.

can any1 give me a reason why the volta isn't a protour race and races where hardly anything interesting happens like eneco tour and tour of california are? and before the ToC fans start, watch and volta first before you say anything about it. i watched last years ToC and it was worse then the volta in all aspects

ToC is not a pro tour race and as far as I have heard its only being considered/planned for 2012. I like the Portugal tour and agree its underrated. I have been to Portugal several times. I just wish they would use more of the country, I feel like it always seems to be in the same region.
 
Sep 12, 2010
32
0
0
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
I'm not convinced gravel is as effective as some may think (gravel is certainly no P-R), the race is epic irregardless. But if it's raining, then yeah.. it's pretty amazing
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
that's what I mean, IMO cycling is a spectacle. I reckon we should be holding races on courses that promote spectacle, with so many variables to factor in with gravel, hills and then the scenery of Tuscany to top it off, this is a race that is "beautiful" in every sense of the word....
 
Mar 26, 2009
2,532
1
0
Timmy-loves-Rabo said:
It's annoying that we cant even get tv coverage for races like Emilia

That's Rai's fault; by what I know they usually ask too high wage for the rights (at least happened with Sanremo years ago).
 
Apr 26, 2010
325
0
0
Eroica for me as well.
I also think the Tour of Britain is under-rated in the eyes of the rest of the world, it's a great race!