The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
ElChingon said:The term arises only when a rider never tries to do anything in a race and just well sucks wheel. If a rider at least gives it the old college try to get a win they are not called wheel sucker. We've all seen the real wheel suckers who would never ever get to the front of the race and just sit there the whole race and not even try for a win, well they get the "Wheel Sucker" moniker and deserve it.
Thomsena said:Completely agree, benotti. There are no 'wheelsuckers' in pro cycling. It's a term used by people who usually have no knowledge in the sport or the people who creates threads in the clinic.
fatandfast said:this term is hardly used. Cadel had guys suck his wheel for 4 days..uphill!. He never mentioned the sucks in his draft. The time lost by Andy on the tours early climbs were because he didn't go positive and ride at his own pace or just jump and try to attack. If anybody hates the term wheelsucker it will be the guys in the first couple of climbing stages that sat in and waited. The non drafter is on the top step. Win or lose the winner of this years tour was won by a non wheel sucker
Thomsena said:This is exactly where it goes wrong. I know it's hard to imagine(!!) but perhaps Andy and the rest of the lot had a hard time climbing a ****ing mountain? Perhaps they didn't have the legs to make a successful attack? Perhaps they were on the limit and just barely hang on (I know it's hard to imagine since it's not a sport of fatigue... Oh, wait?..) - but no, that makes you a 'wheelsucker'... Pathetic. Pathetic term.
swuzzlebubble said:
Thomsena said:This is exactly where it goes wrong. I know it's hard to imagine(!!) but perhaps Andy and the rest of the lot had a hard time climbing a ****ing mountain? Perhaps they didn't have the legs to make a successful attack? Perhaps they were on the limit and just barely hang on (I know it's hard to imagine since it's not a sport of fatigue... Oh, wait?..) - but no, that makes you a 'wheelsucker'... Pathetic. Pathetic term.
swuzzlebubble said:
T-Nielsen said:swuzzlebubble said:[/QUOTE![]()
Who is that wheelsucker at the back.![]()
ElChingon said:The term arises only when a rider never tries to do anything in a race and just well sucks wheel. If a rider at least gives it the old college try to get a win they are not called wheel sucker. We've all seen the real wheel suckers who would never ever get to the front of the race and just sit there the whole race and not even try for a win, well they get the "Wheel Sucker" moniker and deserve it.