The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
not sure what philosophy you're talking aboutDescender said:All of them are pretty bad and quite even this year, but I like the TdF philosophy better, despite that hideous last mountain stage.
Tour-Giro-Vuelta if forced to rank them.
I just couldn't decide, so I penalised the Tour for being the 100th edition.roundabout said:They all kinda suck.
Giro is probably the least bad of the lot.
Don't really see why Vuelta is better than the Tour though.
roundabout said:They all kinda suck.
Giro is probably the least bad of the lot.
Don't really see why Vuelta is better than the Tour though.
The Vuelta set our expectations to "minimal" so gets praised for being better than anticipated even though it's still far from being "good", whereas the Tour hyped itself up to be actually good and screwed us around with those rumours of doing something interesting like a Pierre-Saint-Martin finish only to deliver the same tired old crap.roundabout said:They all kinda suck.
Giro is probably the least bad of the lot.
Don't really see why Vuelta is better than the Tour though.
The make as much money from having dull stage finishes in various towns as possible philosophy.Eshnar said:not sure what philosophy you're talking about![]()
This......The Hitch said:For making 2 times up a meh 14km climb sound like the hardest stage in gt history.
roundabout said:Don't really see why Vuelta is better than the Tour though.
Same here.Descender said:Am I the only one who can't access the TdF profiles?
Netserk said:The Corsica stages:
![]()
![]()
![]()