RDV4ROUBAIX said:
If one of the "S" brands quit on you or you crash it, you can basically throw it away, not so with Campy, they're totally rebuildable.
So I'm up late and bored, again, just browsing through old posts and this is something that troubles me about the bike industry as a whole; everything seems so wasteful. I will qualify that I ride carbon fiber bikes, so take what I say with a grain of salt: I'm no angel myself.
Anyways, there just seems to be a lot of waste in cycling...at all levels. Pro cycling is an eyesore, let's be honest; how much fuel do the team cars burn up supporting what is supposed to be an "environmentally friendly" sport? This trickles down to regular users, too; one thing that dissuaded me from pursuing SRAM was their extremely liberal, wasteful warranty policy. They know they make cheap components, so cheap they can just throw away supposedly "high end" componentry on a warranty service. What's up with that? What happened to fixing/rebuilding something when one part goes wrong? I wouldn't throw away my vintage Fender pickups simply because they stopped working; I would investigate why, and if I couldn't fix the problem I would pay someone to do it for me. Learning about SRAM's "warranty" service, that is, they simply throw their crap away because it's literally that cheap to produce is problematic for my own personal ethics.
I know I can't be the only one that has this apprehension; I was mortified at the pile of just food related waste that built up in the trashbag in my car; gels, bar wrappers, energy drink powders/bottles, etc. Makes you reflect that if you are doing it, so too are thousands of others and when taken as a whole, it's just a lot of damn waste. So trying to switch to baking my own food for cycling, using reusable containers, etc to cutback on gels. Saves some money too...but there are times I find myself crawling back to the prepackaged crap for the sake of "convenience." Sigh.