The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
this is a good oneLanark said:The 1997 Tour time trial in Saint Etienne was crazy as well, with a 13 km climb in it. Ullrich beat the number two with more than 3 minutes.
![]()
Falken said:The Mont Ventoux time trial muste have been quite hard. 21.6k climb, no resting point, just up and up, and when they get over the three line there is the wind that can be quiet hard.
Eshnar said:yes but it was a Mountain Time Trial.
Not hard but definitely crazyEl Pistolero said:Stage 1b of the Giro d'Italia 1987.
More Strides than Rides said:Profile of 2009 Giro for comparison's sake
![]()
2009: ~16k at just under 4%, then 7.5k at 6.8%,
1997: more than 8.5k at 6.9%, plus other rolling hills
When in the tour was the 1997 TT? The Riomaggiore TT came after a rest day, mountains (including sestriere) into pinerolo, and a flat stage, in that order
Eshnar said:NOT MTT![]()
Ok, there's need to define a MTT.airstream said:elevation in chamrousse tt is less than in the tt menchov won
Eshnar said:Not hard but definitely crazy
Btw,
How long were your last 20 years?![]()
Shouldn't you take into account other factors like for istance, how many times you have to change pace? A long straight TT could be easier than a twisty one.Bavarianrider said:However, there is no such thing like a hard or an easy TT in reality.
A TT means riding as fast as possible, no matter if it is flat or hilly or mountain. You always ride what is possible for you. No relacing whatsoever. Therefore, how hard a TT is simply depends on how long you have to work during that TT.
Eshnar said:Shouldn't you take into account other factors like for istance, how many times you have to change pace? A long straight TT could be easier than a twisty one.