- Jan 5, 2010
- 295
- 0
- 0
This has bugged me with the Landis affair and hopefully someone can set me straight. Apparently Floyd claims he did not take synthetic testosterone at the Tour, so technically he was innocent of the doping offence that stripped him of the title. OK, I can maybe follow his logic. There was a nasty hearing, he lost and he served his suspension. When it comes time to look for work he contacts probably the shadiest team owner there is -- Michael Ball, whose Race Director Rudy Pevenage, was the man responsible for both the rise and subsequent fall of Jan Ullrich. This is a team which hired almost every suspected doper with a pedigree, both foreign and domestic. This is who Floyd wanted to ride for? When that didn’t work out he seeks work for a continental team for a season and produces little if anything in the way of results. Then he contacts his old Director and Lance about a ride . . . . and this guys says that he was conflicted and felt terrible for the lies he told. Really? I’m curious, has Floyd ever taken a lie detector test? I would love to see the results. I think he is probably telling the truth about the doping at Postal, but little else rings true to me. What I would like to ask him is during his comeback attempt, did he ever use PEDs? After his suspension, when he was training and shopping for a new team and before he took the highroad and ratted on everyone, was he riding clean? His angst seems awfully convenient. Does anyone believe that if Floyd had been given a contract at Radioshack any of this would have happend? He wouldn’t be able to live with the lies and would have confessed and implicated Armstrong and company. Do you think he would have refused to blood dope as a member of the Shack? Just how honorable is he and pure his motives?