The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Remember last year when we all said that was the best tour we've ever seen?
How wrong we were. No-one know's what the 3rd week will bring, but that is to quote Adam Blythe 'brilliant'
So in summary, I think the real winners are the fans.
Pogacar being favored by 5 minute splits at the end of a mountain should hardly be controversial. I get disagreeing with fixating on a single data point, but I don't think the data points to Pogacar being his best on a super long climb.I don't get why people are still pointing at the Col de la Loze as Pogacars big weakpoint. Yeah he wasn't great there in 2020, but he was probably worse a day later on a low altitude, steep and short climb. People only fixate on the Col de la Loze result because that actually amounted to a time loss.
In this Tour so far the mountain stages Vingegaard looked the best on were the Laruns stage and today, while Pogacar looked a bit better on Puy de Dome, the Grand Colombier, the Joux Plane and the Tourmalet stage. The whole Col de la Loze narrative formed based on the assumption that Vingegaard is better on longer climbs, higher altitude and generally harder stages. So that's literally the exact opposite of how this Tour has played out so far. Looking at this Tour alone one should really predict the Col de la Loze stage to be the one favoring Pogacar and the Vosges stage to favor Vingegaard. I don't think that's the correct takeaway either. I think the correct takaway is that the kind of mountain stage really doesn't matter a lot and it's only about who has the best legs.
Is your first name Arnaud?Gaudu for a laugh (Yes, I know it won't happen). Hoping for Pog out of the top 2. I'm getting a bit bored with Vingo.