Following Van Uden's win yesterday, at what point do the UCI step in and limit/ban aero helmets/aero gear in road races? This seemed to start with aerosuits in sprint stages over 10 years ago now, and has now reached the point of visors on aero helmets. Can the cat be put back in the box?
In the past there have been examples of the UCI banning certain items Jumbos 'golf ball' helmets/Sky had one at the tdf iirc.
I understand the need for R&D, but surely this has to be limited depending on the discipline.
The rise in speed
Increase in high risk crashes
awareness around individuals in the bunch with limited viewing ie the pinic helmets yesterday
by banning is this not something that can help to reduce risk to all those points?
and with a purely aesthetical hat on, it's ugly (the stretched skinsuits with sponsors all over the place), not cool (in both senses) and does nothing for the image of the sport.
In the past there have been examples of the UCI banning certain items Jumbos 'golf ball' helmets/Sky had one at the tdf iirc.
I understand the need for R&D, but surely this has to be limited depending on the discipline.
The rise in speed
Increase in high risk crashes
awareness around individuals in the bunch with limited viewing ie the pinic helmets yesterday
by banning is this not something that can help to reduce risk to all those points?
and with a purely aesthetical hat on, it's ugly (the stretched skinsuits with sponsors all over the place), not cool (in both senses) and does nothing for the image of the sport.
Last edited: