• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

Why is Froome doing so much better than other dopers?

Why is Froome doing so much better than other dopers?

  • He’s clean, and so are most of the riders. He’s just better currently

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jul 10, 2013
155
0
0
Froome’s performances last couple of years look very suspicious. Though if he’s doping he’s hardly likely to be the only one in the peloton. Yet, with the possible exception of Quintana, nobody looks like they can get close to him

So must be something more to it
 
Jul 10, 2013
155
0
0
mikehammer67 said:
Sky / UCI are working together to cover up failed tests (or similar)

After the fallout from Armstrong, what's in it for the UCI?

can only be a huge bribe from Sky to be worth the risk?
 
Aug 21, 2012
24
0
0
I beleive Froome must respond better to the next generation PEDs than others, possibly due to that sickness.
 
Jul 10, 2013
155
0
0
Dekker_Tifosi said:
There are superresponders to doping. For some it helps more than others who are doing the same. Froome is probably a superresponder

so part of the “aggregation of marginal gains”? :cool:
 
The answer covers options 1 & 3 & might add the some heavy cash flow going through all Race Organizers & anti-doping agencies together to look the other way. As in 99 with LA after the Festina scandal - They know the sport cannot survive a blow of that caliber after what took place with USADA , so they need to sell the world the idea of SKY being "clean" at all costs-even if the public ain't buying it at all.....
 
May 19, 2011
4,857
2
0
Red Lobster said:
Doing more or less what the others are doing; however, like Armstrong, his physiology is more receptive/responsive than most ... so he reaps an outsized return.

yep, doping is all about who responds best in certain way. Dr. Leider's methods may just suits Froom perfectly, his resemblance to the CHICKEN is uncanny.:eek:
 
I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really? :confused: I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.
 
His BP is a mess due to the bilharzia, and due to this he can blood dope full throttle without being caught, for this reason, his the best Sky rider, and Sky riders have access to dope other teams don't know about

That's what i think at least
 
Red Lobster said:
I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really? :confused: I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.

There have been a lot newly registred members lately...
 
Nov 26, 2012
3,216
0
0
are you guys serious?

DB wants WADA to come and do whatever test that they want.
Accept that Froome is better than Armstrong and Marco Pantani(RIP).

Sky has the right kind of money and connections. So those who voted anything other than "Froome is clean" are going to get sued. Now, you know that sueing is the least painful thing that sky can do.

(Ohhh.. i am a poor person, so i didn't vote)
 
Jul 15, 2013
5
0
0
Doping is the only reliable way to get an improvement over 10%, with just training and equipment the difference between froome and the rest should be less. So or the rest is clean and Froome uses doping, or Everyone is using doping, Froome just the better one.

I do think people want to believe he is clean, but it's just a game on which the UCI is always 2 steps behind. By the time they know how to trace one kind of doping a new kind is already developed. To much money involved.
 
Oct 17, 2011
1,315
0
0
Red Lobster said:
I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really? :confused: I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.

Yes I noticed that too haha, dunno whether they are trolling or really believing lol..
 
Jul 10, 2013
155
0
0
Red Lobster said:
I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really? :confused: I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.

A similar amount though believe it's a new magical mystery drug

There's one thing thinking Froome is doping, the results and cycling history speak for themselves, but even Armstrong was doing the same drugs as everyone else

People, quite rightly, scoff when it's claimed Sky have better training/doctors/equipment than the other teams and that's why they're doing better yet at the same time take as fact that they can do doping better
 
Dec 6, 2012
80
0
8,680
Red Rick said:
His BP is a mess due to the bilharzia, and due to this he can blood dope full throttle without being caught, for this reason, his the best Sky rider, and Sky riders have access to dope other teams don't know about

That's what i think at least

This is pretty much what I think at this juncture. I think there must be some sort of connection between the increase and decrease of white blood cells in his body that obviously affects his red blood cell count, which in turn affects his performance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.