The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
mikehammer67 said:Sky / UCI are working together to cover up failed tests (or similar)
Logic Al said:After the fallout from Armstrong, what's in it for the UCI?
can only be a huge bribe from Sky to be worth the risk?
Benotti69 said:what's the risk?
auscyclefan94 said:Why wasn't Rupert Murdoch an option? He is the bringer of all evil in this world!![]()
Dekker_Tifosi said:There are superresponders to doping. For some it helps more than others who are doing the same. Froome is probably a superresponder
Red Lobster said:Doing more or less what the others are doing; however, like Armstrong, his physiology is more receptive/responsive than most ... so he reaps an outsized return.
Red Lobster said:I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really?I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.
Red Lobster said:I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really?I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.
Red Lobster said:I know it is a small sample size so far ... but over 25% of clinic posters think Froome is clean? Really?I guess such prevalence of insane willingness to believe explains the continued success of the Nigerian Internet scams.
webbie146 said:Yes I noticed that too haha, dunno whether they are trolling or really believing lol..
Red Rick said:His BP is a mess due to the bilharzia, and due to this he can blood dope full throttle without being caught, for this reason, his the best Sky rider, and Sky riders have access to dope other teams don't know about
That's what i think at least