Not a UAE fail because they met their objective (UCI points)This is not the first UAEfail this season. Should we bury the Rabofail meme on the forum?
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Not a UAE fail because they met their objective (UCI points)This is not the first UAEfail this season. Should we bury the Rabofail meme on the forum?
most embarrassing team performance of the year
Not a UAE fail because they met their objective (UCI points)
Ulissi to win the race from the breakaway tomorrow?
By end of the day.. Yates just didn't have a legs... and UAE look bad now I get it. But don't think this was so bad as it look. Only clear mistake to me was that Ulissi shouldn't have pull in the end... He should have taking the stage win.. But easy to say after.
trite... once you have so many top riders and top talents, it is normal that several of you end up in the top 10. just take a look a few years ago. then Sky won? or was it already Ineos? 1st 2nd and 3rd in Catalonia, Romandie and SwitzerlandNot a UAE fail because they met their objective (UCI points)
You are really the type of person who can explain it perfectly via the computer after every ride. why didn't you become a DS? tomorrow is a tough ride. not a single km is flat. if you set a high pace early on with Torres and Laengen, Lutsenko will soon be alone.Ok but that's literally a super bad decision. It was obvious that Yates wasn't really good here and that he couldn't drop Lutsenko, he tried multiple times. Lutsenko tried once and Yates was in throuble. It's just an incredibly dumb choice to let Ulissi pull there. And not just because he's the fastest there, also because at the moment he starts Sivakov is like 5 seconds behind and Sivakov was still in good position in GC, could've atleast kept him closer. Now GC is basically done and they also missed the stage win. That's a huge fail.
Ok but that's literally a super bad decision. It was obvious that Yates wasn't really good here and that he couldn't drop Lutsenko, he tried multiple times. Lutsenko tried once and Yates was in throuble. It's just an incredibly dumb choice to let Ulissi pull there. And not just because he's the fastest there, also because at the moment he starts Sivakov is like 5 seconds behind and Sivakov was still in good position in GC, could've atleast kept him closer. Now GC is basically done and they also missed the stage win. That's a huge fail.
You are really the type of person who can explain it perfectly via the computer after every ride. why didn't you become a DS? tomorrow is a tough ride. not a single km is flat. if you set a high pace early on with Torres and Laengen, Lutsenko will soon be alone.
But it wasn't obvious all day that Yates couldn't drop Lutsenko. I think it was fair enough they was making the race hard for Yates.
Pogacar will do under 35 in the GiroLmfao
2012 | 38:58 | Vincenzo Nibali
2013 | 38:23 | Chris Froome
2021 | 36:07 | Tadej Pogacar
2024 | 36:02 | Alexey Lutsenko
Seriously? Ulissi now as fast as Pogi in 2021?!Lmfao
2012 | 38:58 | Vincenzo Nibali
2013 | 38:23 | Chris Froome
2021 | 36:07 | Tadej Pogacar
2024 | 36:02 | Alexey Lutsenko
Seriously? Ulissi now as fast as Pogi in 2021?!
They have better training methods nowadays. Dinosaurs like Pogacar, nibali, froome never did an interval session in their lives. Lutsenko probably also watches his dietLmfao
2012 | 38:58 | Vincenzo Nibali
2013 | 38:23 | Chris Froome
2021 | 36:07 | Tadej Pogacar
2024 | 36:02 | Alexey Lutsenko
People are complaining about the last 5km, not all day. It was obvious in the last 5km of the race. A good Yates would've already been gone by then. No one is laughing with them pacing hard all day, ofcourse that's valid tactics, it's about them sacrificing Ulissi in the end instead of having him winning the stage and by doing that also putting their own teammate who was still close in GC on more seconds.
Dave Brailsford and Emilio Magni the original bald frauds with their 1970s training methodsThey have better training methods nowadays. Dinosaurs like Pogacar, nibali, froome never did an interval session in their lives. Lutsenko probably also watches his diet
Nutrition can make miracles. Sorry for the people who can't dream big and believe in miracles, the sceptics....They have better training methods nowadays. Dinosaurs like Pogacar, nibali, froome never did an interval session in their lives. Lutsenko probably also watches his diet
A bit cold I think, but not too bad for climbing Pogacar went from about 5.5k to go which might've changed the w/kg but could also consider that today was much more stop/start with the attacking.What were conditions like on the ‘21 ascent?
16C and sunny according to https://www.procyclingstats.com/race/tirreno-adriatico/2021/stage-4/liveWhat were conditions like on the ‘21 ascent?
Ulissi was probably more in the wind today than Pogi was back then.A bit cold I think, but not too bad for climbing Pogacar went from about 5.5k to go which might've changed the w/kg but could also consider that today was much more stop/start with the attacking.
Yeah.....we are missing the tailwind!What were conditions like on the ‘21 ascent?
So Froome and nibs who I assumed attacked and looked good winning for their times would have finished back in 10th with a 50 year old Pozzovivo. Huge if trueLmfao
2012 | 38:58 | Vincenzo Nibali
2013 | 38:23 | Chris Froome
2021 | 36:07 | Tadej Pogacar
2024 | 36:02 | Alexey Lutsenko