Jay Hindley
Tao Geogenhart
Pavel Sivakow
Ben O'Connor
The Yates twins
Hindley and Tao's pink jerseys say hi.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Jay Hindley
Tao Geogenhart
Pavel Sivakow
Ben O'Connor
The Yates twins
Exactly. That's why they are "good" riders as in the thread title.Hindley and Tao's pink jerseys say hi.
Tour of the AlpsExactly. That's why they are "good" riders as in the thread title.
But they are unable to win anything else, despite being eternal favorites based on their "former glory" = overrated imho
Imagine someone calling a former World champion, winner of LBL and winner of a Vuelta, a overrated rider. At least we can laugh a bit.Remco is a overrated rider too. Expectations were extremely high for him since his youth. I don't see him winning a Tour in the future (in fact I have my doubts if we will ever see Remco winning another GT)
It's like conditional statements. Most people fail the basics.Overrated is a relative term. Its not hard at all.
hmm. I wouldn't say overrated.Remco is a overrated rider too. Expectations were extremely high for him since his youth. I don't see him winning a Tour in the future (in fact I have my doubts if we will ever see Remco winning another GT)
IF A then B is equivalent to if not B then not A.It's like conditional statements. Most people fail the basics.
It's true that: "If it rains, then the Moon is Earth's only natural satellite." Thus the contrapositive is trivially true, but most people just don't get it.
I feel violatedIF A then B is equivalent to if not B then not A.
Logic is your friend
This is about as appropriate as tennis is on a cycling forum
Because he don't deserve. He is rated correctly.Why is Vingegaard not in this list, lol.
Because he don't deserve. He is rated correctly.