The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
StephenC2020 said:Lexman said:yaco said:Likely to struggle in the longer mountain stages - Keep his form and should finish top 6 in the GC.
that seems optimistic no?
1. froome
2. Nibali
3. Chaves
4. Contador
5. Zakarin
6. De La cruz / Kelderman / Aru/Superman
so around tenth place would be more realistic
Well he didn't keep that form did he?
HelloDolly said:StephenC2020 said:Lexman said:yaco said:Likely to struggle in the longer mountain stages - Keep his form and should finish top 6 in the GC.
that seems optimistic no?
1. froome
2. Nibali
3. Chaves
4. Contador
5. Zakarin
6. De La cruz / Kelderman / Aru/Superman
so around tenth place would be more realistic
Well he didn't keep that form did he?
I dont think the form is gone...he suffered in the cold and couldn't use his legs
While he is not the greatest climber his TT is much better than alot of the above plus as we all know there is a long way to go and alot can still happen.
He's too bulky to keep up in the long climbsDFA123 said:Looks like the lack of hype surrounding Roche was correct. Completely found out as soon as the high mountains came. Now down to 17th after a disastrous showing today and over 20 minutes off the pace.
TJ still in with an outside chance of a top 10 though if he can put in a good time trial.
Yeah, in hindsight it looks like the wrong strategy, given the strength of the GC competition this year (compared with when he has done better in the past). But maybe Sanchez being withdrawn forced him into playing the second GC role, rather than stage hunting.bob.a.feet said:He's too bulky to keep up in the long climbsDFA123 said:Looks like the lack of hype surrounding Roche was correct. Completely found out as soon as the high mountains came. Now down to 17th after a disastrous showing today and over 20 minutes off the pace.
TJ still in with an outside chance of a top 10 though if he can put in a good time trial.
DFA123 said:Looks like the lack of hype surrounding Roche was correct. Completely found out as soon as the high mountains came. Now down to 17th after a disastrous showing today and over 20 minutes off the pace.
TJ still in with an outside chance of a top 10 though if he can put in a good time trial.
Yep, it seems to me that he has wasted his career a bit. He's a very talented rider - he can climb fairly well on most terrain and has a good sprint for a climber, but he has a pretty disappointing palmares to show for his abilities. Probably a combination of focusing on the wrong races and taking the money to be a big team domestique, rather than trying to lead a smaller team.Dekker_Tifosi said:I don't know why Roche is trying to be a GC rider. He tried a couple of times before in the Vuelta.
I think he would have been much better if he focussed his career on Ardennes classics.But it's rather late now
DFA123 said:Yep, it seems to me that he has wasted his career a bit. He's a very talented rider - he can climb fairly well on most terrain and has a good sprint for a climber, but he has a pretty disappointing palmares to show for his abilities. Probably a combination of focusing on the wrong races and taking the money to be a big team domestique, rather than trying to lead a smaller team.Dekker_Tifosi said:I don't know why Roche is trying to be a GC rider. He tried a couple of times before in the Vuelta.
I think he would have been much better if he focussed his career on Ardennes classics.But it's rather late now
I'm not sure what you're trying to say here. Do you mean that there is pressure on him to follow the same role as his dad? Because I would argue that the opposite may be the case; that surely it would be better for him to carve his own career - maybe going for classics - rather than trying to follow in shoes that he'll never be able to fill.HelloDolly said:DFA123 said:Yep, it seems to me that he has wasted his career a bit. He's a very talented rider - he can climb fairly well on most terrain and has a good sprint for a climber, but he has a pretty disappointing palmares to show for his abilities. Probably a combination of focusing on the wrong races and taking the money to be a big team domestique, rather than trying to lead a smaller team.Dekker_Tifosi said:I don't know why Roche is trying to be a GC rider. He tried a couple of times before in the Vuelta.
I think he would have been much better if he focussed his career on Ardennes classics.But it's rather late now
em have you heard of oedipus complex....if your Dad is a GT ?
He was only going for GC at this Vuelta because BMC had no other stand out options. TJ lasted longer with the leaders on 15, but not by so much that it'll make a big difference in Madrid.Dekker_Tifosi said:I don't know why Roche is trying to be a GC rider. He tried a couple of times before in the Vuelta.
I think he would have been much better if he focussed his career on Ardennes classics.But it's rather late now
movingtarget said:Roche was never his father or anything close. Talented rider who never had a stand out ability as a climber, sprinter or TT rider. He probably should have made the switch as a domestique much sooner and concentrated maybe on the one week stage races but even then probably wasn't going to win them. Just under the elite level where that missing one or two percent makes all the difference.
HelloDolly said:movingtarget said:Roche was never his father or anything close. Talented rider who never had a stand out ability as a climber, sprinter or TT rider. He probably should have made the switch as a domestique much sooner and concentrated maybe on the one week stage races but even then probably wasn't going to win them. Just under the elite level where that missing one or two percent makes all the difference.
I actually think that is not really correct ....
His Dad was riding in a differnt era when the competetion was not so fierce (well the amount of it and the specialism) plus other factors were in play
Roche has shown occasionaly glimpes of the ability that can win races...its there but what with weight issues,concentrating on the wrong things, being a GC leader too young and other factors he never really got it together ...
Hw would have been better to have not tried to be a GC rider ...his bulid and ability in high mountains were major handicaps.... He did give up that gaol when he signed for Tinkoff in 2013 but not completely when it came to the Vuleta and in fairness he has had good resutls at the Vuelta despite his physical handicaps
But if he had used his climbing and speed esp in the early days and tried as a rouler he would have alot better palmares now and yes a few stage race wins in the mode of Luis Leon Sanchez or Tim Wellens
HelloDolly said:I wasnt comparing Nico to his Dad who was indeed much better ...Dan Martin is more like Stephen Roche
I meant is not fair to say Nico is not elite ...he is not great in long mountains but he is elite in other aspect when in form
Zinoviev Letter said:Pop-genetics is usually best ignored. The relationship of genetics to elite athletic performance is still very poorly understood.
He has 5 top 10s at San Sebastian. I don't think it's that he's never tried one-day racing, just things haven't gone his way in them at all. IIRC he was Sky's designated leader at LBL in 2015, but crashed out; I'm not sure why he doesn't have more of a record there or at Lombardia, but maybe it's that short punchy climbs don't suit him as well as longer, steadier diesel climbs (the last 2 years at SanSeb, he's missed the split on the steep part of the final climb).HelloDolly said:Zinoviev Letter said:Pop-genetics is usually best ignored. The relationship of genetics to elite athletic performance is still very poorly understood.
This is true ...plus Nico is alot like his Dad too ....I think alot of Nico's career issues may have more to do with poor choices ( like trying to be a GT rider and early team leadership) when he would have been better to have tried one day racing etc ....
Dan Martin developed slowly, concentrated on one day racing first and has made very good choices, didnt try to run before he could walk ....so not all about the physical
Leinster said:He has 5 top 10s at San Sebastian. I don't think it's that he's never tried one-day racing, just things haven't gone his way in them at all. IIRC he was Sky's designated leader at LBL in 2015, but crashed out; I'm not sure why he doesn't have more of a record there or at Lombardia, but maybe it's that short punchy climbs don't suit him as well as longer, steadier diesel climbs (the last 2 years at SanSeb, he's missed the split on the steep part of the final climb).HelloDolly said:Zinoviev Letter said:Pop-genetics is usually best ignored. The relationship of genetics to elite athletic performance is still very poorly understood.
This is true ...plus Nico is alot like his Dad too ....I think alot of Nico's career issues may have more to do with poor choices ( like trying to be a GT rider and early team leadership) when he would have been better to have tried one day racing etc ....
Dan Martin developed slowly, concentrated on one day racing first and has made very good choices, didnt try to run before he could walk ....so not all about the physical
Martin has a finishing kick that Roche can only dream of, so it's obvious that he'd be able to target a few more one-day races. Other than that, their race programs have been pretty similar down the years, and it's only his last 2 years with Quickstep that Martin has genuinely contended in the Tour GC.