Recent content by Bannockburn

Re: Indeed. It was raining.

Re: Re: To the first question, not even close. But, obviously, due to his overwhelming amount of success he gets a lot of attention, which of course is going to include criticisms and questions, as well as justifications and excuses, all depending on one's perspective. A star in any given...

Re: This is patently incorrect. As soon as Froome is gone some other transparent fraud will come along and take his place. Been going on for 30 years now. Whether he will be quite as laughable as Froome, we shall see, but the comic tragedy shall indeed write itself yet another act... And some...

Not that it's the end-all-be-all by any stretch, but Dumoulin's comments on Wiggins make him an intriguing possibility here. At least moreso than many of the others...

Re: Re: Hasn't JV's claim been that Wiggins was doing most (if not all) his training with Ellingworth/British Cycling?

You're ruining my fantasy here...

Considering the fact Walsh blocks almost anyone who asks him a question on twitter, what's he going to do if someone on the cruise presses him a bit on his Sky bag toting, throw them over the rail? At this point, the man is nothing short of amazing.

Re: Re: Your laughable assumptions about Evans and Sastre are also impossible to proof, but you keep digging there, good soldier, and hopefully you'll someday be able to clearyfy it all up for the rest of us.

Re: Congratulations. Not much makes me laugh out loud, but you managed to pull it off. Twice. Horner has gotten his results because he has cheated his whole life. It's about the longest-running non-secret out there. When you're a doper that is so comical that the rest of the dopers find you...

Simply incredible.

Re: Re: If you can't make sense of simple English that's your problem, not mine.

Re: Re: It would be easier if Spud first operated on the correct premise. That being that the data Spud is relying on to promote her false premise is utter nonsense. Always seems to conveniently skip over that part.

Good post, Chewie. Surprised the chorale is fanning on it.

Re: Wait, I thought the gentleman's agreement was in 1999. And again in 2006. Then again in 2008. Now there was one in 2011 as well??? :confused: :)

The blame for that flameout lies with André Birotte, who happened to receive a promotion in 2014 and is now a district judge in California.