Recent content by Jack Aubrey

The majority (CN excluded) would disagree.

I'll bet your wrong and that UCI will dispute any samples from 99 used to determine or contribute to determining non-analytical positive. Let's wait and see...

Never used the term but it's not about suspecting of doping. Read this forum - the majority are trying to discredit every aspect of his existence.

The supposed retested EPO samples from '99 are also an old story and a non-starter. USADA better have much more than that in their evidence. Some credible riders , not Floyd and Tyler, need to have supported the conspiracy story in their testimony.

'Two riders are believed to have given affidavits that Armstrong told them he had a positive test swept under the carpet at the 2001 Tour of Switzerland and another has sworn that Armstrong told him he could use his influence with UCI to circumvent cycling’s anti-doping laws' Why bother...

Honest question here - who thinks he was (is) doping for his triathlon comeback where he won a couple of triathlons, and with what?

As poupou said (the real one) they might as well go all the way backk to 1903...

The truth needs to come out. The whole truth and nothing but the truth.

OK If I got this right now: Armstrong was just an average joe triathlete/cyclist who only succeeded because he was a bully, was doped to his gills on everything under the sun, and had all the authorities covering for him. Without all that, he could only manage 50th place in the Tour de Gila.

Tyler Hamilton for one

Regardless of Armstrong's character, any sport at the very top level is alot more than physical. Much more than plugging values in a calculator. Whatever anyone thinks of him, he is almost universally acknowledged as being one of the absolute toughest mentally. Is that worth + 10 VO2 max? Read...

They also said they would send the reasoned decision. Don't hold your breath...