We hope all of you have a great holiday season and wonderful Christmas. Thanks so much for being part of the Cycling News community in 2025 and beyond!
Given the time Bissegger did in the first split, I think it will indeed be a 51 km/h ITT for the winner if not faster.
Maybe it's not a super fast TT, but pretty fast nevertheless.
2 guys in a break getting 10 minutes is 20 minutes. Ineos for example lost 4 minutes over the Galibier. Don't get me wrong, I think UAE are favorites, but it's not over.
Durbridge is 4 s/km faster than Martinez on the first flat part. I can see the main stage favorites being 4s/km faster over the whole route (except perhaps for the downhill) so the winning time may well be 1'30'' + better than the current one.
I am not sure that they will go in breaks in the intermediate stages, so while they are favorites, I would not quite say that winning the team GC is a done deal.
Armstrong arguably (because I really do not want to restart the Ventoux finish debate) did not contest a stage finish with Basso and Pantani.
Although it also irked some people that he was seen as giving away stages, so there is no 100% right approach to being the dominant rider.
there are roughly 35km of categorized uphill left. Losing 1 minute/km uphill perhaps would be an OTL, but a bit less than that should be enough to stay within the time limit.
I actually looked at the wrong table in one of the other threads (I think the Israel one)
A stage win is worth more points than 11th on GC and 4 stage 5th places are worth more than 10th on GC so it makes sense to have a rider who can score points in the flat stages with 7 to 9 stages possibly...