The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The Hitch said:Startline. Leopard Trek who couldnt care less allowed to ride because it was the easiest way for them to get a TDF place, while teams that could field better squads and would give their arms and legs for a place get nothing.
auscyclefan94 said:Why do we have to have a "controversy thread"? If their is a controversy, let it have it's own thread.
McClimber said:Stage 2 - Sprint
Alessandro Petacchi did not hold his line and Mark Cavendish should have won.
I agree that if it was the other way around that MC would have been disqualified.
You mean even bigger than Cavendish losing a slightly dodgy sprint?md1975 said:Should we save a spot for Contador? If he wins and they come back guilty? We all know that will be the biggest controversy of the whole year.
md1975 said:No doubt a fact. Cav is too fast, and would of won had he held his line. Now, had Cav pulled this tactic he would of been DQed for it.
Should we save a spot for Contador? If he wins and they come back guilty? We all know that will be the biggest controversy of the whole year.
B_Ugli said:I think that everyone needs to re-look at the footage. Its true that Petachhi veered to his left and came of his line. Did he put Cavendish into the barriers? No he didnt, but he did just enough to deter Cavendish from going for gap that wasnt there.
Cav = Bad loser
Petacchi = Tactical sprinter
exeuropro said:Crafty old sprint by Ale Jet, borderline but not quite Cav sore loser Cav been marketing nightmare now for some time. HTC surely not extending his contract. Sky will find out next
auscyclefan94 said:Why do we have to have a "controversy thread"? If their is a controversy, let it have it's own thread.