75th Tour de Romandie (2.UWT) // 27th of April - 2nd of May 2021

Page 24 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 5, 2010
51,701
30,252
28,180
How will they organise the neutralisation? They talked about "taking the time at the top of the climb", does that mean they'll stop a group to maintain the time? And will they at least allow Mads Würtz to drop all the way back to the peloton?


So... neutralised for 3 Ks? My French is not what is has been... or rather; it's exactly what is has always been.
 
May 5, 2010
51,701
30,252
28,180
I guess more riders will get back into the main peleton.

Unless the gruppetto - and other lose configurations of dropped riders - are also behind safety cars, and told to take it easy.

So are they just giving the break a couple of extra minutes now?

Doesn't look like it.
And I think the neutralisation might be over, the graphics has disappeared from the screen.
 
Jul 13, 2012
3,789
3,988
19,180
That's a farce. Break taking a minute or so after the peleton being neutralised. Either everyone does it no one gets neutralised imo.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan
Jun 20, 2015
15,366
6,032
28,180
The whole reason for a neutralization is for the gaps to remain the same at the completion of the neutralization.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
May 5, 2010
51,701
30,252
28,180
The "neutralisation".

Surely the neutralisation is over for both groups by now... I suppose it makes sense that first the break was neutralised, allowing the peloton to get a little closer, and then the peloton was neutralised, allowing the break to get a little further away. Possibly with some overlapping between the neutralisations.
 
Jul 13, 2012
3,789
3,988
19,180
Surely the neutralisation is over for both groups by now... I suppose it makes sense that first the break was neutralised, allowing the peloton to get a little closer, and then the peloton was neutralised, allowing the break to get a little further away. Possibly with some overlapping between the neutralisations.

The time at the top of the climb and the time at the end of the neutralisation didn't seen the same to me anyway. Be interesting if anyone had exact figures on that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan
May 5, 2010
51,701
30,252
28,180
The time at the top of the climb and the time at the end of the neutralisation didn't seen the same to me anyway. Be interesting if anyone had exact figures on that.

What would they have done? Stopped the group that had gotten an advantage? Couldn't it simply have been that the riders were told that for those 3 Ks, they had to take it easy, but once that part was over they could go all in again?
 
Jul 13, 2012
3,789
3,988
19,180
What would they have done? Stopped the group that had gotten an advantage?

Ya, if one group got an advantage cos the speed allowed for them in the neutralisation was higher than the other group, it should be reset to what it should have been and pretty much exact to what it was at the top of the climb.