The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
blackcat said:well, Wigans just won Dauphine...
I think his name gotta stay but
BullsFan22 said:What are the odds of him being clean during this race?
Exactly the same as before this race.BullsFan22 said:What are the odds of him being clean during this race?
BullsFan22 said:What are the odds of him being clean during this race?
hmsgenoa said:Not a lot of people know this but guess who were staying at Dave M's pad at the same time? The GB Team Pursuit squad - they kept that one quiet didn't they?
Wiggins_fan said:Wondering the same... Team sky is supposed to have a strong anti-doping stance but I think he's doped like the rest.
Mambo95 said:It's pretty easy to keep something quiet if it didn't happen. Or do you expect us to believe that six weeks before the Olympics the four man team where sent to a town which doesn't have a velodrome to stay in the one bedroom flat of a rider who's team was under heavy police investigation? What would be the point of that.
They were in Manchester and then Newport.
Winterfold said:hmsgenoa - A brilliant exercise in trying to make someone who challenged your completely unsusbstantiated claim appear to be a conspiracist who needs to back up their challenge.
I call bull**** on your posts.
Of course there is some possibility that every cyclist could have doped - even Boardman - but that is an easy position that takes no guts or conviction.
hmsgenoa said:I don't expect you to believe anything, least of all that the winner of a week long professional stage race in the Dauphine Alps is squeaky clean. He may be but maybe not. As for three week races, if Lance doesn't manage to buy his way out of trouble, then the results of the last 10 Tours De France can come under genuine question.
As I said 'not conclusive proof' but the way you answer, trying to sound so completely reasonable - but fundamentally flawed - makes me wonder further. I don't doubt they were in Manchester and then Newport. I also don't doubt that a little warm weather training in Mediteranean climes might have been quite useful too. A lot can happen in a split second let alone six weeks.
This is the 21st century, we have tranes, planes and automobiles, not cart horses only. Road training is quite a big component of a pursuit or team pursuits schedule. Of course I'm sure the French Police made the GB squad privy to their investigation - not. And it's not a co-incidence that Dave B was knocking around down there, oh no. And I quite agree with your penultimate sentence, which really ought to have a question mark against it - then it really does start to make sense. Maybe a Freudian slip? But you seem to know quite a lot reading between the lines. We'll agree to disagree on this one.
Libertine Seguros said:Team Sky quietly dropped the "nobody ever involved in doping ever" stance in the offseason, mainly because they realised just how hard it is to get experienced DSes who weren't around in the EPO era.
Mind you, they had Michael Barry on the team before that anyway.
Calorie restriction: Sounds like Chris Horner.danjo007 said:dont think hes doping atm, he simply just doesnt EAT food!
python said:speculation aside, i have two serious questions for those in the know...
1. in 2009 wiggins touted his weight loss as the main factor in his performance boost. were there any reliable reports as to his weight at 2011 dauphine ?
2. in 2011 wiggins touted altitude training as the 'new' approach giving him some performance boost. were there any reliable reports of him ever experimenting with altitude training BEFORE 2011 ?
hmsgenoa said:Yes a valid question, and don't forget who was dining with David Millar when he got collared, Bradley's chum David Brailsford. No smoke without fire although that doesn't constitute conclusive proof. Not a lot of people know this but guess who were staying at Dave M's pad at the same time? The GB Team Pursuit squad - they kept that one quiet didn't they?
One would like to think Bradley's clean but he's definitely taken a step forward of late, was his training not optimal before? Is it just down to more hours in the saddle?
hmsgenoa said:I don't expect you to believe anything, least of all that the winner of a week long professional stage race in the Dauphine Alps is squeaky clean. He may be but maybe not. As for three week races, if Lance doesn't manage to buy his way out of trouble, then the results of the last 10 Tours De France can come under genuine question.
As I said 'not conclusive proof' but the way you answer, trying to sound so completely reasonable - but fundamentally flawed - makes me wonder further. I don't doubt they were in Manchester and then Newport. I also don't doubt that a little warm weather training in Mediteranean climes might have been quite useful too. A lot can happen in a split second let alone six weeks.
This is the 21st century, we have tranes, planes and automobiles, not cart horses only. Road training is quite a big component of a pursuit or team pursuits schedule. Of course I'm sure the French Police made the GB squad privy to their investigation - not. And it's not a co-incidence that Dave B was knocking around down there, oh no. And I quite agree with your penultimate sentence, which really ought to have a question mark against it - then it really does start to make sense. Maybe a Freudian slip? But you seem to know quite a lot reading between the lines. We'll agree to disagree on this one.