I found it interesting in reading today's Gazzetta dello Sport article on Basso's first early season victory in 10 years, how the Italian champion has had a "revolutionary" change of approach to his racing.
Previously, when racing against Armstrong at the Tour, he followed the American's strategy of riding low key until the real build up for July (as did Ullrich as well as others). Now he says that a champion has to be "convincing" even at the early season events.
It's as if gone with the American, so too goes the philosophy. Yet it's surprising how quickly such a "fad" can be dropped for a new, but really old, approach.
As usual, however, CN has left out an important aspect of the said article in their recap of it today: namely, what was discussed about Catalonia being the first real show down between Basso and Contador. Surly Basso wants to present himself as a real rival to the Spaniard's throne and that this has also reawakened his desire to be "convincing" at a time of year when, during the Armstrong years, he could not have cared less about. The most interesting part of the article was precisely about this and the Italian's conviction that he can present himself as such.
Thoughts?
Previously, when racing against Armstrong at the Tour, he followed the American's strategy of riding low key until the real build up for July (as did Ullrich as well as others). Now he says that a champion has to be "convincing" even at the early season events.
It's as if gone with the American, so too goes the philosophy. Yet it's surprising how quickly such a "fad" can be dropped for a new, but really old, approach.
As usual, however, CN has left out an important aspect of the said article in their recap of it today: namely, what was discussed about Catalonia being the first real show down between Basso and Contador. Surly Basso wants to present himself as a real rival to the Spaniard's throne and that this has also reawakened his desire to be "convincing" at a time of year when, during the Armstrong years, he could not have cared less about. The most interesting part of the article was precisely about this and the Italian's conviction that he can present himself as such.
Thoughts?