The low number of participants is because cycling is not allowed to increase it's total number of participants.
Perhaps, but I am unsure about the rules. I thought it related more to the discipline type than all of Cycling. Example Rowing: you have the traditional races, now you have all sorts of different types of races, numbers of competitors must have increase exponentially. Those doing the 8’s for example are not the same who do the canoe races and these athletes are not the same that do the white water stuff.
The main problem I have is that they have to build an entirely new venue just for the sake of 2 gold medals.
Good point but only relevant if a host city did not have to build many buildings to host the Olympics. Is 70-80 mil to build a Velodrome value. What are there, 10 track medals, so 7-8 mil per medal. So the cost of a BMX Track (this one reported at 1.5mil I understand) shows value to the host nation at only 750k per medal/venue.
Agree there are many sports in the same category.
I guess my point was there are athletes who missed selection in some events because they may have been 0.01sec outside of the National Federations qualifying standard or finished 31st on the world ranking and you needed to be in the top 30, so rather than let them compete in the Olympic spirit, they leave them at home. My concern is whether it is the IOC or the National Sports Federations restricting the fields some sports are suffering from lack of competitors at these Olympics. Only 30 Women in the Cross Country MB is a disgrace for one of Cycling’s most popular World Wide disciplines.
Watching the Middle Eastern women athletes on the running track was what I consider Olympic spirit, a Country sending the best they have for an event even though they are not competitive.