You see this quite often being wheeled out implicitly in the media (Harmon etc), by fans, riders etc.
'Britain doesn't have a culture of doping, unlike Europe.'
'In Britain people play by the rules'
'I'd be crucified if I doped so I would never'
And variations on this theme - McQuaid's comments on the Anglo-Saxon world etc.
And of course the view that Spain, Eastern Europe etc are dopers paradises etc
To paraphrase the infamous Tory party quote that 'Wogs begin at Calais' it seems that for many people 'dopers begin at Calais'.
Is there any evidence of Britain having a specifically stringent drug testing which means that anyone so much as thinking of doping gets popped?
The UK has not had any major scandals such as Puerto, Festina, USP - is that absence of evidence (of doping), or evidence of absence (of doping)?
Noting that most large scale busts have involved law enforcement. Is it that UK police simply don't have any interest in anti-doping investigations considering it to the sporting matter (and besides for them there are more important things to do like public shows of force against hippies, students and brown people)
Does it actually hold up that there is an 'anti-doping culture' in UK sport given the track record of cycling in the UK - Simpson, Yates, Millar, numerous track and field, the lack of testing in football, rugby etc
Why go with this line? Is it a line to sell to the nationalists to get to jump onto the bandwagon, to sell a few more copies of your book in W.H.Smith to the Blue Rinse brigade? Does anyone sane and rational actually believe that Brits don't dope - or does believing the latter make the former an impossibility?
'Britain doesn't have a culture of doping, unlike Europe.'
'In Britain people play by the rules'
'I'd be crucified if I doped so I would never'
And variations on this theme - McQuaid's comments on the Anglo-Saxon world etc.
And of course the view that Spain, Eastern Europe etc are dopers paradises etc
To paraphrase the infamous Tory party quote that 'Wogs begin at Calais' it seems that for many people 'dopers begin at Calais'.
Is there any evidence of Britain having a specifically stringent drug testing which means that anyone so much as thinking of doping gets popped?
The UK has not had any major scandals such as Puerto, Festina, USP - is that absence of evidence (of doping), or evidence of absence (of doping)?
Noting that most large scale busts have involved law enforcement. Is it that UK police simply don't have any interest in anti-doping investigations considering it to the sporting matter (and besides for them there are more important things to do like public shows of force against hippies, students and brown people)
Does it actually hold up that there is an 'anti-doping culture' in UK sport given the track record of cycling in the UK - Simpson, Yates, Millar, numerous track and field, the lack of testing in football, rugby etc
Why go with this line? Is it a line to sell to the nationalists to get to jump onto the bandwagon, to sell a few more copies of your book in W.H.Smith to the Blue Rinse brigade? Does anyone sane and rational actually believe that Brits don't dope - or does believing the latter make the former an impossibility?