Clearly I don't understand the cycling justice system. CAS ruled again Valverde at least a month ago that in fact CONI has legitimate evidence that Valverde was involved in blood doping. They upheld the Italian two year ban. So what is the UCI waiting for? I know there's still another (dragging as always) CAS ruling up coming but that is on whether the Spanish Federation should have pressed charges against Valverde. At this point, with the first CAS ruling upheld and a clear ruling that Valverde doped, the second ruling would seem to me to have very little bearing on the UCI immediately slapping a global ban on Valverde. So please, can somebody smarter than me explain this?