http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/12/sports/othersports/12cycling.html?fta=y
up and digging, mulitple posts
about sample taken / not taken / payment / let go
Don Catlin, the prominent antidoping scientist who was supposed to run Armstrong’s program, said Wednesday that they had decided earlier in the day to part ways,
without Catlin’s analyzing a single blood or urine sample from Armstrong. The program was too complex and too costly, Catlin said, and the decision to terminate it was mutual.
“In the real world, when you try to implement a program as grandiose as what you had in mind, it just becomes so complicated that it’s better not to try,” Catlin said, adding that a
contract with Armstrong had never been signed. “We’re all disappointed, but it’s just not going to be possible.”
Before the Tour Down Under in Australia last month, Armstrong said that his customized antidoping program was under way, but he began to back off his initial announcement to publish all of his biological data online. A news release by Astana on Jan. 18, the first day of the race, said that Armstrong would be tested about every three days by Catlin’s program. At that point, Catlin said, Astana had paid him a
“small contribution” to begin taking samples.
Only
one sample was taken, said Oliver Catlin, the chief executive of the Anti-Doping Sciences Institute, Don Catlin’s for-profit laboratory based near Los Angeles.
must of been a hell of a sample that he did not take ?
then read:
Catlin said he was still running the antidoping programs for two professional cycling teams, Team Columbia and Garmin-Slipstream.