There is also a nibali book written by enrico brizzi in collaboration with nibali. Has anyone read it and is there an english version of this book available?
Lo squalo di messina said:There is also a nibali book written by enrico brizzi in collaboration with nibali. Has anyone read it and is there an english version of this book available?
King Boonen said:Lo squalo di messina said:There is also a nibali book written by enrico brizzi in collaboration with nibali. Has anyone read it and is there an english version of this book available?
I was never able to find a translation.
We are no longer working on our main assets. For example: the weather conditions. It was one of our sport's strengths. We are deleting it. If it is too windy, too cold, too rainy, too hot... You always hear that now.
The Hegelian said:The translation of Madiot was very interesting - thanks Echoes.
It's often said that the neo-liberal age was ushered in by Thatcher and Reagan, so I think it is quite fair to think of it as a particularly Anglo-Saxon conception of political economy. But it was conceived on the continent - and it actually has Austro-German roots (Hayek, Von Mises etc). In any case, I agree with Madiot that the predicate of maximising efficiency ends up destroying all other values, and that in the case of cycling, it ought to be resisted. Cycling is what it is because of its traditions and history.
Having said that, there is also a certain kind of denial of reality in Madiot's words - history doesn't freeze on a particular date, and the world is far more interconnected than it was in the heyday of French cycling. The urge to preserve history and tradition at all costs can quickly become a deep fantasy, and a reactionary one at that.
Surely there's a middle ground in all of this?
Echoes said:The Hegelian said:The translation of Madiot was very interesting - thanks Echoes.
It's often said that the neo-liberal age was ushered in by Thatcher and Reagan, so I think it is quite fair to think of it as a particularly Anglo-Saxon conception of political economy. But it was conceived on the continent - and it actually has Austro-German roots (Hayek, Von Mises etc). In any case, I agree with Madiot that the predicate of maximising efficiency ends up destroying all other values, and that in the case of cycling, it ought to be resisted. Cycling is what it is because of its traditions and history.
Having said that, there is also a certain kind of denial of reality in Madiot's words - history doesn't freeze on a particular date, and the world is far more interconnected than it was in the heyday of French cycling. The urge to preserve history and tradition at all costs can quickly become a deep fantasy, and a reactionary one at that.
Surely there's a middle ground in all of this?
With regards to liberalism, I also think that Anglophones have practiced it while continental Europeans theorised it but I'd go a few centuries back in time with the so-called French physiocrats, a branch of the Enlightenment (18th century): François Quesnay or Turgot.
Anyway, I really don't think Madiot wishes to freeze on a particular date. He only focuses on the new races that do not work and that ultimately disappeared: the Wincanton Classic, the Tour of Qatar, the Tour of Peking, ... All of them expected because there was no popular success. No spectators on road sides. In Quebec, there is popular success and it does work (it's what he calls "roots", "ancrage" in French). Both races are now secured for another 10 years. But even though cycling has lost popularity on the Continent, it still is more popular than in many other places. If we have 100 years of cycling history behind us, that's because the sport has had popular success here and you don't sweep it away so easily, saying it's just past time.
I don't have a clue. Ask Guillaume Martin.RedheadDane said::lol:
Do you know if there's an English translation planned? Coz I would love to read that!
Alexandre B. said:Guillaume Martin (Wanty - Gobert) has released his first book : Socrate à vélo (Socrate on bike)
I don't think there's any meaning behind the title. It's basically Socrate riding a bike.Armchair cyclist said:Alexandre B. said:Guillaume Martin (Wanty - Gobert) has released his first book : Socrate à vélo (Socrate on bike)
Does French have the phrase Christ on a bike, or is the title not referring anything in particular? Wish my French were good enough to explore that one.
movingtarget said:Read the Cadel Evans autobiography The Art of Cycling. A pretty straightforward overview of his life and career and a bit dry in parts. Didn't really have too much of interest to say about his rivals, a few anecdotes that were not too surprising. His frustrations at Telekom and Lotto were quite interesting to read about. Not a classic read but good in parts. Still the best Evans book on the market.Some of the others were mediocre.
Tigerion said:movingtarget said:Read the Cadel Evans autobiography The Art of Cycling. A pretty straightforward overview of his life and career and a bit dry in parts. Didn't really have too much of interest to say about his rivals, a few anecdotes that were not too surprising. His frustrations at Telekom and Lotto were quite interesting to read about. Not a classic read but good in parts. Still the best Evans book on the market.Some of the others were mediocre.
I enjoyed it but I am a Aussie and big cuddles fan so not suprising.
From this side of the world I think the best I have read is One way road by Robbie McEwan
It's a cracker of a read, with great humour. Again this is an Aussie view on it so keep that in mind.
Some interesting stuff like growing up as a small weedy kid and having to learn lots of bike handling technique to keep up with the bigger kids in BMX racing, which he kept after he physically matched them.