- May 20, 2010
- 37
- 0
- 0
Found this little piece on a journalism site. If true, I imagine this thread will be locked shortly and I will be banned. Oh well...here goes 
11/8/2010 2:20:59 PM
From JON LITTMAN: On Thursday I had a similar thing to the Cooks Source plagiarism/infringement happen to me.
I wrote a breaking news original story about Lance Armstrong that the LA Times and Daily News could not get because I had original sources (I've been writing about BALCO and sports doping for 7 years; two major pieces for Playboy, where I am a Contributing Editor; 60 for Yahoo Sports; And a dozen for the Huffington Post).
Then Cycling News (an advertising supported site) quoted from my story late Thursday and did a rewrite moving some words around. There was no other source for the story than my article. It was as if the Washington Post had someone rewrite a story that originally appeared in the New York Times without any additional reporting—and without paying or notifying the New York Times.
Cycling News put no link to the Huffington Post. I contacted them and demanded they put in a link. The managing editor refused.
To me this is catastrophic for serious journalism, especially breaking news that requires original reporting. The LA Times would never have done what Cycling News did because their lawyers know it would be an infringement. Cycling News seems to believe they can get away with it (they appear to be headquartered in England). When I complained they put my name on the story. They refused to put up a link to the actual story, and say they never do that.
In more than twenty years of journalism and several hundred articles (I've authored 8 books) I've never had this happen quite as blatantly with an article. But I think it's the present and our grim future. I'm afraid there are hundreds of other for-profit publications with exactly the same ethics as Cycling News. There's money to be made in "borrowing the work" of journalists. Why pay for journalism when you can just "cut, paste and post?" Why create when you can copy?
I also think it's proof that the Cooks Source infringement is part of a larger plague.
On Friday Cycling News' managing editor repeatedly refused to give me contact information for their lawyer. After I sent a second e-mail telling the managing editor this was copyright infringement and plagiarism I found this on their site today (Sunday) — a 404 - page not found reference. They apparently knifed out my story to destroy the evidence. The original link (but not the actual story) is still up on google.
404 - Page not found
The page you have requested is not available on our server.
It is possible the page has been moved, updated or deleted. Please click the back button on your browser and try another link. [Permalink]
11/8/2010 2:20:59 PM
From JON LITTMAN: On Thursday I had a similar thing to the Cooks Source plagiarism/infringement happen to me.
I wrote a breaking news original story about Lance Armstrong that the LA Times and Daily News could not get because I had original sources (I've been writing about BALCO and sports doping for 7 years; two major pieces for Playboy, where I am a Contributing Editor; 60 for Yahoo Sports; And a dozen for the Huffington Post).
Then Cycling News (an advertising supported site) quoted from my story late Thursday and did a rewrite moving some words around. There was no other source for the story than my article. It was as if the Washington Post had someone rewrite a story that originally appeared in the New York Times without any additional reporting—and without paying or notifying the New York Times.
Cycling News put no link to the Huffington Post. I contacted them and demanded they put in a link. The managing editor refused.
To me this is catastrophic for serious journalism, especially breaking news that requires original reporting. The LA Times would never have done what Cycling News did because their lawyers know it would be an infringement. Cycling News seems to believe they can get away with it (they appear to be headquartered in England). When I complained they put my name on the story. They refused to put up a link to the actual story, and say they never do that.
In more than twenty years of journalism and several hundred articles (I've authored 8 books) I've never had this happen quite as blatantly with an article. But I think it's the present and our grim future. I'm afraid there are hundreds of other for-profit publications with exactly the same ethics as Cycling News. There's money to be made in "borrowing the work" of journalists. Why pay for journalism when you can just "cut, paste and post?" Why create when you can copy?
I also think it's proof that the Cooks Source infringement is part of a larger plague.
On Friday Cycling News' managing editor repeatedly refused to give me contact information for their lawyer. After I sent a second e-mail telling the managing editor this was copyright infringement and plagiarism I found this on their site today (Sunday) — a 404 - page not found reference. They apparently knifed out my story to destroy the evidence. The original link (but not the actual story) is still up on google.
404 - Page not found
The page you have requested is not available on our server.
It is possible the page has been moved, updated or deleted. Please click the back button on your browser and try another link. [Permalink]