RDV4ROUBAIX said:You should do an offshoot of weight weenies, called stiff weenies.
ROTFL......
I won't ask what the site's logo would look like.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
RDV4ROUBAIX said:You should do an offshoot of weight weenies, called stiff weenies.
slcbiker said:I wouldn't use a $22000 ultra-custom bike as an example for anything.
ukpaul said:James
Sorry I dont agree with you there.Road bikes are all about the weight adding discs will not help road bikes at all.
- far improved modulation for more *controllable* power. Yes maybe.
- lighter rim weights as rims would no longer have to be built to cope with brake clamp forces. Lighter rims at the expense of heavier disc rotors,brakes,hoses.
- fewer tire blowouts due to heat build-up. ??? Really Ive been riding for more than 20 years and have never heard of anyone having a tire blow out due to heat build up.
- more aerodynamic rim shapes . very minimal.
embankmentlb said:Disk brakes have just not been sufficiently refined for road use. They have been tried on road tandem bikes for years but with limited success. Front disks suffer from two problems. Overheating on long descents & vibration transmitted through a lightweight fork. Rear disks live a happier life on a tandem & do an OK job if used in moderation. For a single road bike a rear disk would be overkill. Even in the mountain/ cross world disk brakes are only an advantage in muddy conditions.
RDV4ROUBAIX said:Forget all this talk of disk this disk that. The future of stopping your bike lays in electromagnetics. Frictionless baby!