sittingbison said:
It did get me thinking though King Boonen. Reminded me of this:
Now if you remove the bolded final line which theoretically turns all the ingredients into a pharmacological gruel, and only ingest all the natural ingredients mentioned individually, would that trigger clause S0?
Could Dawg - adament he will never ever be caught doping and his win will stand the testament of time - be eating some natural ingredients like this recipe? Sure in the knowledge it is not covered under WADA? Is Horner now eating Turks Nose and Jews Liver instead of a hamburger and fries for his longevity?
Ok, this seems a more reasonable example than water, so I'll try and give a decent answer. I'm an analytical chemist (Mass Spectrometrist to be exact) and my biology isn't great but I'm confident I understand the basics I'll mention here.
As far as I'm aware, no. You can eat whatever natural products you want (non-refined things), but if it contains a banned substance you need to prove it came from there whether endogenously, salicylic acid from Willow although I don't think that's banned, or exogenously, see the Mexican footballers Berto was desperate to emulate.
Natural drug products is a massive research area for many reasons that I won't go into, but the likelihood of Sky or Radioshack finding a food source that has the effect of change people are attributing to Froome and Horner is tiny. Really, really tiny.
Even if they did you then have other problems. If you eat something it has to get past both the stomach and through the liver where the CYP3A's break down pretty much anything (this is a massive issue in the pharmaceutical industry). This is why things like anabolic steroids and EPO have to be injected, they won't survive to get to where they need to be if you just stick them in a power-shake and drink it. Hence why the no needle policy in cycling is so good and why Mr. McQuaid wants to claim it as his own. I personally think the no needle policy should be part of the WADA code.
And remember, anything they have found must not clash with the banned list which has some very overreaching rules. If it were proved that they knew it did and were using it, that's doping.
You then have other rules than just the S0 one quoted so far (Just a few highlights):
S1. ANABOLIC AGENTS
Anabolic agents are prohibited.
S5. DIURETICS AND OTHER MASKING AGENTS
Masking agents are prohibited.
M1. MANIPULATION OF BLOOD AND BLOOD COMPONENTS
The following are prohibited:
1. The administration or reintroduction of any quantity of autologous, homologous or heterologous blood or red blood cell products of any origin into the circulatory system.
2. Artificially enhancing the uptake, transport or delivery of oxygen, including, but not limited to, perfluorochemicals, efaproxiral (RSR13) and modified haemoglobin products (e.g. haemoglobin-based blood substitutes, microencapsulated haemoglobin products), excluding supplemental oxygen.
3. Any form of intravascular manipulation of the blood or blood components by physical or chemical means.
M3. GENE DOPING
The following, with the potential to enhance sport performance, are prohibited:
1. The transfer of polymers of nucleic acids or nucleic acid analogues;
2. The use of normal or genetically modified cells.
S6. STIMULANTS
All stimulants, including all optical isomers (e.g. d- and l-) where relevant, are prohibited, except imidazole derivatives for topical use and those stimulants included in the 2013 Monitoring Program*.
You'll also see sentences like these:
Exogenous* AAS, including:
and other substances with similar chemical structure or similar biological effect(s).
Aromatase inhibitors including, but not limited to
These are used a catch-alls and are very difficult to get round, I've thought about it and can't think of a way except pleading ignorance.
to the questions about what is a pharmacological substance, look up drug on wikipedia.
As with all threads that end up like this, I urge you to read the WADA code and do at least some reading around to make sure you know what the terms mean (not directed at you Sitting_Bison, mainly at Doperhopper).
Reductio ad absurdum is just going to get peoples back up.