The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
happychappy said:Probably.
Allthough maybe the better question being why weren't they on it last year? I can still see the entire team at the front on the first climb in the tour then all of them blowing up spectacularly after a few minutes.
Catwhoorg said:They have a strong anti-doping stance.
Basecase said:With their success this year is there any evidence of this?
gustienordic said:I would say that Garmin & Sky are perhaps the cleanest teams in the peloton... I wouldn't suspect many of their riders to be anywhere near doping. Both of them have successful antidoping programs.
Ferminal said:How do you tell a "successful antidoping program" ?
Ferminal said:Sky - doubt it.
Team GB - more likely, couldn't rule it out.
auscyclefan94 said:Aren't they the same thing ultimately run by the same people?
auscyclefan94 said:Aren't they the same thing ultimately run by the same people?
bobbins said:Would any tests done through GB get covered up if they adversely affected a Sky rider? I wonder.....
Ferminal said:How do you tell a "successful antidoping program" ?
TeamSkyFans said:I think GB did (as did many olympic teams) pre lottery funding, but I think since the money has been there the advantages for them have been equipment, coaching and of course having the manchester velodrome.
gillan1969 said:i'm not sure how anyone can question the integrity ethics of a corporate body who hacked dead girls phone, deleted her messages and then sent PIs after the family's legal representatives...
and that's just waht we know about
senior management obviously only look so far if commercial matters are being taken care of
the cycling team would need to out festina festina to score worse on the ethics scale....