How can this review be considered relevant when the 605/705 is only referenced in regard to mounting style??
The 205/305 is not the benchmark here. The 605/705 *long ago* replaced the 205/305 as Garmin's flagship cyclocomputer.
Are there any editors that read the reviews prior to going live?
The 205/305 is not the benchmark here. The 605/705 *long ago* replaced the 205/305 as Garmin's flagship cyclocomputer.
Are there any editors that read the reviews prior to going live?