The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Blythe is an idiot.According to Blythe one reason Pog is a 'leg' is because he wears a £250k watch. Yeh mate, that's why you never reached the top. You were more bothered about your camel toe shoes and what people thought. Bell.
Okay, what's up with Rowe, and her "She has already [so and so] in this season already."?
How is it irritating pronouncing when he's doing the pronounciaction generally correct and how it's supposed to be in the language?There are few Eurosport commentators that don't irritate me as a cyclist. I want to hear interesting analysis not endless fawning, repetition and overemotional sentimentality. Almost all of them seem to be lacking understand of, or reluctant to discuss tactics. It seems to be more about evoking emotions in the viewer. Which I do understand is probably what they are paid to do.
It is what it is. I think watching Lanterne Rouge / Benji (who are excellent in their knowledge, analysis, insights) has made it much worse.
Dan Lloyd - fawning, overly self-deprecating, always going on about "just how good" the riders are (yes we know, we also know many are juiced). embarrassing dad sense of humour
Blythe - smug, too pally, poor sense of humour
Kirby - lacking technical / tactical knowledge but has the best sense of humour, for me
Hatch - irritating pronunciations, overly emotional, generally the most irritating
Kelly - no criticisms although starts every statement with "yes well"
Backstedt - droning voice, often begins with a pained intake of breath, states the obvious, poor insights
Wiggins - improving but not quite comfortable in the role, states the obvious then "hands back to commentary team". Would like to see more humour
Huh?Backstedt - droning voice, often begins with a pained outtake of breath, states the obvious, poor insights
I like Lloyd although he is over the top now with the "cycling is so much better and unpredictable now" schtick. This must be some kind of GCN/ES directive since Hatch wasn't as bad with hyperbole 5+ years ago.
IMHO Matt Stephens is good, just got to fix the sucking-in-air thing.
That list didn't include Jez Cox, who is the most grating to me. Or maybe he's only the smaller GCN/ES Player races?
I like Lloyd although he is over the top now with the "cycling is so much better and unpredictable now" schtick. This must be some kind of GCN/ES directive since Hatch wasn't as bad with hyperbole 5+ years ago.
IMHO Matt Stephens is good, just got to fix the sucking-in-air thing.
That list didn't include Jez Cox, who is the most grating to me. Or maybe he's only the smaller GCN/ES Player races?
I used to really like Hatch (and I still like his correct pronunciation of rider’s names & climbs, place names etc) but I agree that his hyperbole has got worse and worse - I get that his job is to help accentuate & create the excitement, but it’s annoying when we get an “oh dear oh dear oh dear” every time a sprinter gets dropped on a hard climb on a mountain stage !
Yup, and the 10 "rides of the century" in every Giro. A viewer can tell when a race is exciting. Let's say it's 7 out 10 in excitement and I'm enjoying the race. If Hatch repeatedly tells me its a 50, my annoyance with the hyperbole ends up distracting from my enjoyment.I used to really like Hatch (and I still like his correct pronunciation of rider’s names & climbs, place names etc) but I agree that his hyperbole has got worse and worse - I get that his job is to help accentuate & create the excitement, but it’s annoying when we get an “oh dear oh dear oh dear” every time a sprinter gets dropped on a hard climb on a mountain stage !
Yup, and the 10 "rides of the century" in every Giro. A viewer can tell when a race is exciting. Let's say it's 7 out 10 in excitement and I'm enjoying the race. If Hatch repeatedly tells me its a 50, my annoyance with the hyperbole ends up distracting from my enjoyment.
Commentators add to viewing when they do 2 things: 1) Carry conversation when nothing is happening (which at the max end is like 90% for, say, grand tour stages with start-to-finish coverage); and 2) provide info that I cannot see or do not know.
Except they don't need to constantly spool words from their mouth for the duration of the broadcast and fill every last minute. It's something that I don't like as much from Marty MacDonald. He lists the order of the riders or the people in a group and can sometimes continue doing so for a decent amount of time after something important/interesting has happened. Once he's noticed that and spoken about it and maybe asked the co-commentator something, he might point sometbing else out before immediately returning to give another rundown of the group composition only 5 or 6 minutes after the last.Commentators add to viewing when they do 2 things: 1) Carry conversation when nothing is happening (which at the max end is like 90% for, say, grand tour stages with start-to-finish coverage); and 2) provide info that I cannot see or do not know.
Regarding Hatch's pronuncations: I've personally come to notice when he does not pronounce a rider's name correctly. Or; I've come to notice when he does not pronounce the names of Danish riders correctly, most others I don't really know the correct pronuncation of.
An example, that I think I've used before, is 'Kron'. Somehow he manages to pronounce this short four-letter name ever so slightly wrong.