How going through customs worked, recap on Girona and all about Duffy
http://sports.yahoo.com/video/playe...952996#news/Graham_Bensinger_InDepth/25952979
http://sports.yahoo.com/video/playe...952996#news/Graham_Bensinger_InDepth/25952979
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
One immediate problem with the 20-page motion is that it misidentifies some publications as recipients of government leaks in instances when those publications were not the first to publish the news. For example, on July 16, 2010, the Daily News was the first to report that three-time Tour de France champion Greg LeMond had received a grand jury subpoena; Keker's motion attributes the story to the Wall Street Journal, which, like the Daily News and other publications, based its reporting on the subpoena largely on statements made on the record by Greg LeMond's wife, Kathy LeMond.
That fact underlines the second problem with the motion: It implies that recipients of grand jury subpoenas and witnesses who have been interviewed by federal agents are not constitutionally entitled to disclose their involvement with a grand jury investigation, even if their government interviewers are not. They are.
Race Radio said:New interview with Floyd
On Contador "His coach was my drug dealer"
http://sports.yahoo.com/video/playe...952996#news/Graham_Bensinger_InDepth/25952996
On the UCI payoff and coverup of Armstrong positive test
http://sports.yahoo.com/video/playe...952993#news/Graham_Bensinger_InDepth/25952993
“I expect the reason he doesn’t want to sue me and I’m sure Lance Armstrong’s lawyers think the same thing, is because they don’t want to give me an opportunity to start exposing things. Then I get to subpoena people and depose them. There’s also the fact that I’m telling the truth, which is another problem for him.
webvan said:I wonder whether Landis can sue them for going public about a suit they haven't actually filed? What does he have to lose at this point?
palmerq said:This thread is for links only, discussion is for the other threads
BroDeal said:FLandis applies for "probation" for hitting a fence. Three court appearances for hitting a fence? Something is really messed up.
http://murrieta.patch.com/articles/...lies-for-probation-on-evading-charge-b4e969d4
jackcav said:We know lance doped for a 99.9999% fact. He does some good things raising cash for cancer. This will proceed and it is to his credit. He has retired so all further investigation is useless. He may win the most consecutive Tour's Des France (the plural in French)for all eternity but due to the era history will always attach a huge asterisk. Eddy Mercks is still without any controversy the best cyclist ever to grace 2 wheels.(He was by many accounts a notorious user of amphetamines)
jackcav said:We know lance doped for a 99.9999% fact. He does some good things raising cash for cancer. This will proceed and it is to his credit. He has retired so all further investigation is useless. He may win the most consecutive Tour's Des France (the plural in French)for all eternity but due to the era history will always attach a huge asterisk. Eddy Mercks is still without any controversy the best cyclist ever to grace 2 wheels.(He was by many accounts a notorious user of amphetamines)