http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/breves2011/20111129_172608_le-medecin-en-garde-a-vue.html
10 riders have testified. Doctor provided EPO and HGH
10 riders have testified. Doctor provided EPO and HGH
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Race Radio said:http://www.lequipe.fr/Cyclisme/breves2011/20111129_172608_le-medecin-en-garde-a-vue.html
10 riders have testified. Doctor provided EPO and HGH
just some guy said:I have not read the article yet, but 2 things spring to mind.
Pat you have just been shown that you are not winning the war on doping so stop saying you are and the French do use PEDS unlike some romantics were saying when the UCI list came out for rides who showed suspect values.
No significance - BigMat were due to be a sponsor, so it would have little if any association with the actual team or setup.Topangarider said:What's the significance - if any - that Vaughters had almost joined with BigMat?
This would have been terrible for his brand no? Or would it have just been BigMat money and no personnel joining his team?
Topangarider said:What's the significance - if any - that Vaughters had almost joined with BigMat?
This would have been terrible for his brand no? Or would it have just been BigMat money and no personnel joining his team?
It wouldn't have been terrible for his brand at all. The doctor would obviously be related to the team, not the sponsor. BigMat as a sponsor has most likely nothing to do with i. The sponsor simply pays money to show its brand.Topangarider said:What's the significance - if any - that Vaughters had almost joined with BigMat?
This would have been terrible for his brand no? Or would it have just been BigMat money and no personnel joining his team?
just some guy said:I have not read the article yet, but 2 things spring to mind.
Pat you have just been shown that you are not winning the war on doping so stop saying you are and the French do use PEDS unlike some romantics were saying when the UCI list came out for rides who showed suspect values.
sniper said:+1
it's astonishing the number of romantics here that still hasn't figured out that you cannot finish top 20 in the TdF without being prepared.
You're not helping advance our understanding of doping with broad and baseless statements like that. Doping is not immutable. New products and methods are introduced, and new tests are implemented. The boost a rider can get while still getting away with is varies along the line. Moncoutié, our dear International Prototype Meter, was 13th in the Tour in a year of relatively low incidence of doping (for the standards of the time).sniper said:+1
it's astonishing the number of romantics here that still hasn't figured out that you cannot finish top 20 in the TdF without being prepared.
hrotha said:You're not helping advance our understanding of doping with broad and baseless statements like that. Doping is not immutable. New products and methods are introduced, and new tests are implemented. The boost a rider can get while still getting away with is varies along the line. Moncoutié, our dear International Prototype Meter, was 13th in the Tour in a year of relatively low incidence of doping (for the standards of the time).
Just like there are signs that French cycling is getting relatively dirtier, there is evidence suggesting it was relatively clean in the past. Acknowledging this doesn't make you a "romantic" (or a fool, which is more like what you're actually implying), it merely means you don't have preconceived, immutable notions about the state of doping in our sport.
Dr. Maserati said:I think that's a fair distinction.
The measures taken in France 10 years ago to curtail doping are no longer as effective - I think a certain amount of complacency has set in, particularly in relation to pro-conti and amateur side of the sport there.
What will be interesting is to see who the clients of Bedoucha are.
hrotha said:You're not helping advance our understanding of doping with broad and baseless statements like that.
hrotha said:Just like there are signs that French cycling is getting relatively dirtier, there is evidence suggesting it was relatively clean in the past. Acknowledging this doesn't make you a "romantic" (or a fool, which is more like what you're actually implying), it merely means you don't have preconceived, immutable notions about the state of doping in our sport.
sniper said:But even when acknowledging that e.g. Voeckler is less dirty than, say, Aldirto, that still doesn't make Voeckler clean. And I don't see how he could finish 5th being truly clean, which is why I still consider the claim that he did it clean to be a romantic claim.
Kender said:then there is the other possibility.. that everyone else was cleaner than in the past so someone like voeckler can perform well. People might dispute him being clean, but noone will dispute his commitment. You can see him fight every day. he never quits. with this attitude and a bit of luck (yet again they let him disappear in a break) he made it 5th. He could ahve finished even higher than that if he hadn't suicided and dropped back with evans instead.
How is that possible? either he doped more than normal or everyone else doped less. Everyone doping less also has the argument that cadel was not buried in the mountains like he has been in the past. noone had massive accelerations and managed to sustain them like in the past which meant the diesel could grind away
sniper said:Or, indeed, Cadel was better prepared this year.
That would explain why his own team (soigneurs, mechanics, teammates) were all so confident about Cadel's chances in this year's TdF, prior to the start.
Prior to the start, as I remember, a couple of guys within his team explicitly stated that Cadel was gonna be a major candidate this year, and a better candidate than in previous years.
hrotha said:I think there's reason to believe the French doping culture is changing for the worse, and that this is a relatively recent development. I seem to remember there were reports about anomalous values in the French peloton going up by 75% this year?
I don't actually believe in Voeckler and Europcar, and I think their performance is one of the sings I was talking about. But I can't rule out the possibility that they are, in fact, clean, and that everyone else is just cleaner now too, remote as I find it.sniper said:My problem as a poster here is that I know comparatively little about doping.
I'm very much fascinated by it, and pretty much like Noah I simply dislike the idea of cheating in sports in general. But my technical knowledge of both doping and cycling is relatively limited.
I guess my broad Noah-style statements often reflect this.
This is why I like your posts.
You are one of the few thinking of doping in relative degrees.
But even when acknowledging that e.g. Voeckler is less dirty than, say, Aldirto, that still doesn't make Voeckler clean. And I don't see how he could finish 5th being truly clean, which is why I still consider the claim that he did it clean to be a romantic claim.
sniper said:Or, indeed, Cadel was better prepared this year.
That would explain why his own team (soigneurs, mechanics, teammates) were all so confident about Cadel's chances in this year's TdF, prior to the start.
Prior to the start, as I remember, a couple of guys within his team explicitly stated that Cadel was gonna be a major candidate this year, and a better candidate than in previous years.
BroDeal said:What do you mean? I have it on good authority (ACF94) that Evans is clean clean clean. So not only can you place in the top 20, you can win it all.
BroDeal said:What do you mean? I have it on good authority (ACF94) that Evans is clean clean clean. So not only can you place in the top 20, you can win it all.
biker jk said:I'm glad that we can all agree about Cadel being clean.