I'm aware that all the jerseys hold a great level of prestige, so I'm prepared to cop some criticism for my suggestions!
I have an issue with the King of the Mountains jersey. I don't have a problem with the rider that wins it. He has to have ridden a pretty good tour to have done so. Nevertheless, the title given to the jersey is greatly misleading since it suggests that it goes to the best climber in the race. Rarely is this the case.
You can almost always argue that whoever won the KOM wouldn't have won it if some of the GC riders had wanted to win it. You can't say that the yellow jersey wouldn't be on the shoulders of its champion if the KOM had wanted to win it. Neither can you say that the yellow jersey winner could have won the green jersey if he had wanted too. Both the yellow and green jerseys are clearly distinctive.
Let's look at Richard Virenque. He was a wonderful climber. But he wasn't the best. In the Armstrong years Lance was a better climber every time. If Lance had wanted to win the KOM then he could have (though it would have been at the expense of the yellow). If Richard had wanted to win the yellow then he could NOT have. This is the big discrepancy between the jerseys and for me, loses my respect for the polka dot one.
In recent years the only KOM who could have possibly won the yellow was Rasmussen in 2006, whereas every overall winner could have won the KOM.
The KOM could/should still exist in some form. Perhaps it should be called the most aggressive rider jersey (they already have something similar to this), for that would be a more accurate description of the cyclist who wins it.
The green jersey also has an issue because it is supposedly for the most consistent rider. I wouldn't call winning two sprints then losing an hour in a couple of mountain stages consistent. The most consistent is the yellow jersey.
Maybe the green jersey should just be a sprinters jersey, so it is only for points on the finish line of each stage. The sprint points out on the course are removed. Instead we now have 'sprint' points at every 50, 100 and 150 km point of each stage (regardless of terrain) which go towards the aggressive rider competition. Maybe the 150 point is double points.
The KOM jersey has given glory to some riders who otherwise wouldn't have had it (or at least as much glory). But I think that the grand tours should pay homage to the top ten riders in the GC instead of just the podium finishers. The tenth placed rider all the way to the winner could be announced and applauded by the crowd. After accepting their prize the fourth to tenth riders walk off, while the top three stand on the podium.
I have an issue with the King of the Mountains jersey. I don't have a problem with the rider that wins it. He has to have ridden a pretty good tour to have done so. Nevertheless, the title given to the jersey is greatly misleading since it suggests that it goes to the best climber in the race. Rarely is this the case.
You can almost always argue that whoever won the KOM wouldn't have won it if some of the GC riders had wanted to win it. You can't say that the yellow jersey wouldn't be on the shoulders of its champion if the KOM had wanted to win it. Neither can you say that the yellow jersey winner could have won the green jersey if he had wanted too. Both the yellow and green jerseys are clearly distinctive.
Let's look at Richard Virenque. He was a wonderful climber. But he wasn't the best. In the Armstrong years Lance was a better climber every time. If Lance had wanted to win the KOM then he could have (though it would have been at the expense of the yellow). If Richard had wanted to win the yellow then he could NOT have. This is the big discrepancy between the jerseys and for me, loses my respect for the polka dot one.
In recent years the only KOM who could have possibly won the yellow was Rasmussen in 2006, whereas every overall winner could have won the KOM.
The KOM could/should still exist in some form. Perhaps it should be called the most aggressive rider jersey (they already have something similar to this), for that would be a more accurate description of the cyclist who wins it.
The green jersey also has an issue because it is supposedly for the most consistent rider. I wouldn't call winning two sprints then losing an hour in a couple of mountain stages consistent. The most consistent is the yellow jersey.
Maybe the green jersey should just be a sprinters jersey, so it is only for points on the finish line of each stage. The sprint points out on the course are removed. Instead we now have 'sprint' points at every 50, 100 and 150 km point of each stage (regardless of terrain) which go towards the aggressive rider competition. Maybe the 150 point is double points.
The KOM jersey has given glory to some riders who otherwise wouldn't have had it (or at least as much glory). But I think that the grand tours should pay homage to the top ten riders in the GC instead of just the podium finishers. The tenth placed rider all the way to the winner could be announced and applauded by the crowd. After accepting their prize the fourth to tenth riders walk off, while the top three stand on the podium.