• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

If They Were Tied....

Chick Chandler said:
If Andy and AC were exactly tied on time at the end of the Tour, How would the winner be determined?

You mean tied to the milisecond? well that is highly highly unprobable, but if it happened schleck would win based on his 2 stage wins. And if contador hadnt given him the tourmalet stage, then it would be based on who had more 10 placed finishes i think.
 
Apr 8, 2010
329
0
0
Visit site
L'Equipe published the calculation today. Inline stages are recorded to the second, and time trials to the nearest 1/1000 second. If Schleck hadn't lost 39 seconds through chaingate, he would have won the Tour by 640/1000 of a second.
 
Mar 10, 2009
1,295
0
0
Visit site
Most wins, most second, etc. If there was still a tie then the placing at the final stage.
Andy would have won the overall with 2 firsts on stages.
 
Apr 8, 2010
329
0
0
Visit site
Escarabajo said:
Can you provide the link please?

Thanks.

I'm not sure if a link will work, as it's the online paid version:
http://www.lequipe.fr/Quotidien/article_html.php?ID=eq_100725_2040950

this is what it said:
"640/1000e
Sans l’incident du port de Balès, où il avait perdu 39’’ sur Contador, Andy Schleck serait aujourd’hui devant Contador au général pour 640 millièmes de seconde. Explication : 39 secondes les séparent ce matin. C’est le temps perdu lors de la 15e étape par Schleck, victime d’un saut de chaîne dans le port de Balès. Sans ce déficit, les deux coureurs, classés dans la même seconde, auraient été départagés par les millièmes enregistrés sur leurs chronos (prologue et contre-la-montre d’hier). Et Andy Schleck aurait été devant pour 640 millièmes de seconde."
 
Jul 22, 2009
3,355
1
0
Visit site
Square-pedaller said:
L'Equipe published the calculation today. Inline stages are recorded to the second, and time trials to the nearest 1/1000 second. If Schleck hadn't lost 39 seconds through chaingate, he would have won the Tour by 640/1000 of a second.
No wonder Contador was crying at the end of stage 19.